Alpha 7S III

Pixel size having any noticeable effect on low-light performance is a myth. https://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm Add the A7SIII (12mp) and A7RV (61mp) and look at how they have the exact same performance from ISO 1600 to 12800.

If you need low light, FX3/A7SIII are unmatched. That's the primary differentiator

Let me once again get up on my soapbox and preach the gospel of the ZV-E1... Exact same sensor and processor as the A7SIII and the FX3 in a much smaller, lighter and cheaper body. 4K60P with no crop, 4K120p with an APSC crop, amazing low light capabilities, 4:2:2 10bit codecs and really excellent AI

Sony a7siii and fx3. Dual iso for the win.

I use it all the time, I’m shooting commercials, pilots, films and music videos with it. The A7siii will be good for another 10years. Some scenes of a music video I just shot on a GH4. Dude this camera shoots 4k 120fps 422 at night… what more do u need this camera to do? Get it and go have fun! 🤩

I can't quit that fx3/a7s3 2nd base ISO at 12800 plus the options on 3rd party lens. Sony ecosystem is still future proof.

Хрень это, на самом деле а не 108 мегапикселей. Просто маркетинг. На качество изображения в первую очередь влияет размер сенсора, размер пикселя на этом сенсоре, и сколько света он получает. Камера, на 10 мегапикселей, но у которой большой качественный сенсор, улавливающий много света - снимет чётче

In 5.9k and 6k Open Gate lowlight performance is even better and you can get away even with 25600. Sony and Lumix ISO is different and 12800 on Panasonic is brighter (and sharper) than same iso value on A7S3 or FX3. I agree about 24 mpxespecially with all social media requirments where even 10 megap

A6700 only has 800/2500, 12800 refers to FX3, A7Siii, that's why I'm afraid with my APS-C

Honestly yeah, I may try to adapt it to my Sony A7SIII that has insane lowlight iso. It would allow me to ramp up shutter speed.