Z f

Way overhyped. I can't imagine paying 1800 dollars for a point and shoot that isnt a Leica. And even then it'd be unnecessary. I just bought a full frame mirror less Nikon Zf for about 200 bucks more and its 10x the camera that power shot is.

Between just these camera bodies? Fuji. All my controls are within hands reach......and I like a more tactile feel and intentionality. 2) I use mainly apsc nikon bodies (d5500, d3400) and 35mm film cams with a 35 mm prime (now 85 for 2026). My main camera body is beginning to fail after probably an

I use both systems extensively. I switch between xt5, z8, xt20, xt 30, etc. If you're not a jpeg soc shooter, it's a significant improvement using Nikon. Full frame files from my z8 beat my xt5 images, despite the small difference in megapixels. I'm not sure what raw editor you use, but Lightroom ne

Get a simpeler smaller camera is usually my recommendation. Something that you can put in a pocket, and don't need a bag for. Something that doesn't need you to bring extra lenses etc.The more you bring, the more cumbersome it is to use, the more it will become a center in your travels. Also, having

Jumped in on Fuji when the X-T2 was new because I got some advice from a friend who is a wedding photographer and he said if you’re going to buy an APS-C kit then go with a company who are all in on APS-C. Stayed with Fuji for years and years but I think after they scored a big hit with the X100v th

Entry level DX lenses are not worth the price of the FTZ to adapt to full frame Z bodies. You'll be left with only 10MP on the Zf, technically an upgrade over your D40x but very wasteful. You could've got the Nikon 40 f/2 or multiple other Chinese Z mount lenses for that price. You're mis-allocating

If size and weigh is a concern why don’t you make one of your two systems compact? Nikon ZF + 50mm 1.8 Fuji X-E3 23mm f2 or similar compact Fuji instead of the larger X-H1 Just a thought.

I have loads of old lenses for my film cameras. I have adapted them to my Fuji a few times. Tbh though, I ended up buying a Nikon Zf for this purpose. It's super annoying not getting the full field of view on these classic lenses without using speed boosters etc. Full frame is much better for this.

I truly don't get the existence of the 75 Heliar. The resulting photos look like Vaseline has been smeared on the front element. I'd rather get a lens that creates nice, sharp photos and then put mist filters/post process softening on the files than be left with a weird, soft master image. But to an

Why buy the 16mm 1.8? It’s massive and the same price as a used Fuji 16mm 1.4 This sounds a bit confusing you're making it sound like Fuji 16 1.4 is an alternative option on my Nikon Zf which of course it isn't. I switched to Nikon and so of course I need the full frame version for my Nikon. The 16