Z f

I own both and use both as my only digi cams. the ZF is a lot bigger then the x100vi, add in a 24-120 and the difference is huge. They're just different cameras, the x100vi comes with me everywhere, is fun, comes to parties etc, I don't edit the photos off it. The Nikon ZF is huge, but comes with me

I had just placed my preorder yesterday for the new sand beige version, I think it looks great. I’m actually coming over from the Fujifilm system and the X-S10. I’ve been eyeing OM system for a while now, super intrigued by its compact form factor, IPX rated weather sealing, and computational featur

Get a simpeler smaller camera is usually my recommendation. Something that you can put in a pocket, and don't need a bag for. Something that doesn't need you to bring extra lenses etc.The more you bring, the more cumbersome it is to use, the more it will become a center in your travels. Also, having

If size and weigh is a concern why don’t you make one of your two systems compact? Nikon ZF + 50mm 1.8 Fuji X-E3 23mm f2 or similar compact Fuji instead of the larger X-H1 Just a thought.

It’s the lens selection that has kept me away from Nikons zf. They have 2 smaller sized lenses. And the rest are all like big bricks. I had full frame before. And it was just too heavy. Full frame made more sense with the simpler lens designs. These days lenses have a lot more glass in them. I tried

Another Dad here with young kids: I have an OM5i and the Panasonic 12-35 2.8 is on the camera 80% of the time. I use the 25mm 1.7 for indoor birthdays etc but I’d much rather something wider and brighter like Panasonic 15mm 1.7 or Oly 20mm 1.4. I think a nice bright lens beats the autofocus improvem

Own the om3 have used the zf and use other Nikon full frame regularly. I own much more capable bodies from all brands and the om3 gets used a lot. I would pretty strongly recommend the om3. Specific to the picture profiles. The om3 creative dial is favourite feature and I use it consistently. Once y

Why buy the 16mm 1.8? It’s massive and the same price as a used Fuji 16mm 1.4 This sounds a bit confusing you're making it sound like Fuji 16 1.4 is an alternative option on my Nikon Zf which of course it isn't. I switched to Nikon and so of course I need the full frame version for my Nikon. The 16

Depends on which kit lens. Not all kit lenses are created the same. Those plasticky 18-55 APS-C for entry level DSLRs? Ew. Really slow. 18 on APS-C is not wide enough. Immediately useless when you get a fast prime. Aren't worth anything when trying to get rid of them. But Fuji 18-55? Awesome. [email protected]

It seems to me that Ricoh is going to let Pentax die without ever saying the brand is cancelled. I’ve heard before that is the way Japanese companies do this. Which is unfortunate, because we still don’t have a full frame DSLR the size of a classic analog SLR. Even the Nikon ZF is bigger and that is