Z f

I own both and use both as my only digi cams. the ZF is a lot bigger then the x100vi, add in a 24-120 and the difference is huge. They're just different cameras, the x100vi comes with me everywhere, is fun, comes to parties etc, I don't edit the photos off it. The Nikon ZF is huge, but comes with me

I had just placed my preorder yesterday for the new sand beige version, I think it looks great. I’m actually coming over from the Fujifilm system and the X-S10. I’ve been eyeing OM system for a while now, super intrigued by its compact form factor, IPX rated weather sealing, and computational featur

Q1: If you're just looking at lens resolution, this should be a fairly objective question you can look up. Q2: The D600, D610, D750, Z5 all use the Sony IMX128 sensor The D780, Z6, Z6ii, Z5ii, ZF all use the Sony IMX410 sensor The IMX128 is a slower, single-gain sensor, where the maximum DR (at full

I use both systems extensively. I switch between xt5, z8, xt20, xt 30, etc. If you're not a jpeg soc shooter, it's a significant improvement using Nikon. Full frame files from my z8 beat my xt5 images, despite the small difference in megapixels. I'm not sure what raw editor you use, but Lightroom ne

Get a simpeler smaller camera is usually my recommendation. Something that you can put in a pocket, and don't need a bag for. Something that doesn't need you to bring extra lenses etc.The more you bring, the more cumbersome it is to use, the more it will become a center in your travels. Also, having

Entry level DX lenses are not worth the price of the FTZ to adapt to full frame Z bodies. You'll be left with only 10MP on the Zf, technically an upgrade over your D40x but very wasteful. You could've got the Nikon 40 f/2 or multiple other Chinese Z mount lenses for that price. You're mis-allocating

Yes, of course it's relevant. It didn't break when the newer models came out. IQ isn't and issue and hasn't been for around 15 years. Pretty much every full-frame camera from every brand has had pretty much the same IQ during this time--the Canon 5D mark iii was probably the last camera with previou

Another Dad here with young kids: I have an OM5i and the Panasonic 12-35 2.8 is on the camera 80% of the time. I use the 25mm 1.7 for indoor birthdays etc but I’d much rather something wider and brighter like Panasonic 15mm 1.7 or Oly 20mm 1.4. I think a nice bright lens beats the autofocus improvem

I truly don't get the existence of the 75 Heliar. The resulting photos look like Vaseline has been smeared on the front element. I'd rather get a lens that creates nice, sharp photos and then put mist filters/post process softening on the files than be left with a weird, soft master image. But to an

I moved from GFX as well. Files were great but even the GFX 100 II the autofocus wasn’t great. The other thing that bugged me was the 200mb raw file size. Constantly filling up cards and hard drives. Didn’t mind the lens selection but hated the native lens prices. $2.3k for a 55/1.7 is ridiculous. I