Z f

Why buy the 16mm 1.8? It’s massive and the same price as a used Fuji 16mm 1.4 This sounds a bit confusing you're making it sound like Fuji 16 1.4 is an alternative option on my Nikon Zf which of course it isn't. I switched to Nikon and so of course I need the full frame version for my Nikon. The 16

Entry level DX lenses are not worth the price of the FTZ to adapt to full frame Z bodies. You'll be left with only 10MP on the Zf, technically an upgrade over your D40x but very wasteful. You could've got the Nikon 40 f/2 or multiple other Chinese Z mount lenses for that price. You're mis-allocating

Own the om3 have used the zf and use other Nikon full frame regularly. I own much more capable bodies from all brands and the om3 gets used a lot. I would pretty strongly recommend the om3. Specific to the picture profiles. The om3 creative dial is favourite feature and I use it consistently. Once y

I don't understand what you're asking. Fujifilm has their own look, in some cases a different sensor filter array, and their own models and user interfaces and form factors and lens portfolio. Nikon has their own look, models, user interfaces and form factors and lens portfolio. You use the camera t

A zf with your old lenses and the adapter will be a huge system to lug around. I bought a small xt20 in 2019 and slowly all my Nikon full frame gear started to collect dust. Finally completed the transition to Fuji in 2024. The zf does look appealing, but the only lens I would fever use on it would

this is exactly how i feel. I am trying to decide between a ZF, X-h2, X-T5 and im just in decision paralysis. I dont like the nikon lenses because they dont match the ZF style. I love fuji lenses and cameras, but the ZF sensor is soo good. having owned multiple Fuji's and full frames, i often bounce

I've used the 3 major systems (Canon, Sony, Nikon), and I don't regret sticking with Nikon. From a general perspective - I think most newer FF bodies have pretty great AF performance. Can't speak from a video standpoint but from a stills POV - I've never struggled in any situation with any system as

So, I have the Z30 + 2 lens kit you mentioned (same sensor, slower processor than the Z50II), and the Zf (effectively the same as the Z5II with retro styling), though I bought the 24-120 instead of the 24-70. In my opinion the Z50II + 16-50 and 50-250 is an excellent combination of body and lenses,

I jumped from Fuji to Nikon about a year ago after shooting Fuji since the X-T2 was new. Some of it was due to dissatisfaction with the direction Fujifilm were taking, I didn’t enjoy the X-T5 as much as the XT-2 I’d upgraded from (I’d ran the T-2 into the ground) and realised I could get a full fram

Hey! I’ve used the OG Z50 as well as the Z5, Zf, and Z8. I will say this: the Z50 with the DX 24mm f/1.7 prime felt like it weighed nothing. Meanwhile, the Zf with the 26mm f/2.8 - the lightest lens I have for it - is definitely noticeable. I would carry the Z50 with 16-50 or 24 in hand with a wrist