Z f

Between just these camera bodies? Fuji. All my controls are within hands reach......and I like a more tactile feel and intentionality. 2) I use mainly apsc nikon bodies (d5500, d3400) and 35mm film cams with a 35 mm prime (now 85 for 2026). My main camera body is beginning to fail after probably an

Way overhyped. I can't imagine paying 1800 dollars for a point and shoot that isnt a Leica. And even then it'd be unnecessary. I just bought a full frame mirror less Nikon Zf for about 200 bucks more and its 10x the camera that power shot is.

Fuji is so overpriced compared to Canon or Nikon, their APS-C camera is literally selling the same price as Canon/Nikon full frame gears. The only advantage of Fuji is weight and retro look. But news is that Canon will introduce a retro style full frame camera this year too, if it can be smaller and

Jumped in on Fuji when the X-T2 was new because I got some advice from a friend who is a wedding photographer and he said if you’re going to buy an APS-C kit then go with a company who are all in on APS-C. Stayed with Fuji for years and years but I think after they scored a big hit with the X100v th

Entry level DX lenses are not worth the price of the FTZ to adapt to full frame Z bodies. You'll be left with only 10MP on the Zf, technically an upgrade over your D40x but very wasteful. You could've got the Nikon 40 f/2 or multiple other Chinese Z mount lenses for that price. You're mis-allocating

Yes, of course it's relevant. It didn't break when the newer models came out. IQ isn't and issue and hasn't been for around 15 years. Pretty much every full-frame camera from every brand has had pretty much the same IQ during this time--the Canon 5D mark iii was probably the last camera with previou

Why buy the 16mm 1.8? It’s massive and the same price as a used Fuji 16mm 1.4 This sounds a bit confusing you're making it sound like Fuji 16 1.4 is an alternative option on my Nikon Zf which of course it isn't. I switched to Nikon and so of course I need the full frame version for my Nikon. The 16

There's also the 8-16mm f2.8, you could probably rent those lenses test out the look and decide. Because $1,000-1,300 (new) is better than $2k for the Zf and another $2k for a 14-24 f2.8 Nikon lens. I feel most pros shoot full frame regardless of photography type.

Just keep what you have unless you can get into one of the Expeed 7 bodies, that is where you will notice a positively enormous difference in Nikon land (ZF, Z50II, Z5II, Z6III, Z8, Z9, ZR). If budget is tight, consider a Z5II, it is the newest entry level full frame Nikon Z camera with Expeed 7 and

Hey! I’ve used the OG Z50 as well as the Z5, Zf, and Z8. I will say this: the Z50 with the DX 24mm f/1.7 prime felt like it weighed nothing. Meanwhile, the Zf with the 26mm f/2.8 - the lightest lens I have for it - is definitely noticeable. I would carry the Z50 with 16-50 or 24 in hand with a wrist