Z f

Get a simpeler smaller camera is usually my recommendation. Something that you can put in a pocket, and don't need a bag for. Something that doesn't need you to bring extra lenses etc.The more you bring, the more cumbersome it is to use, the more it will become a center in your travels. Also, having

Between just these camera bodies? Fuji. All my controls are within hands reach......and I like a more tactile feel and intentionality. 2) I use mainly apsc nikon bodies (d5500, d3400) and 35mm film cams with a 35 mm prime (now 85 for 2026). My main camera body is beginning to fail after probably an

A full frame Nikon zf with, imo, better features is in the same price bracket as this "hype-beast" camera. Think I'm gonna pass. Really hate being negative but Fuji is getting outta hand with their pricing model lately.

I've owned both. I sold the X-T5 due to autofocus issues and picked up the ZF. I have no real issue stating the ZF is superior in every way except size/weight, regardless of the X-T5 getting it's autofocus fixed. That being said, the size and weight difference in use is pretty significant. It's visi

I still have one body and a couple of lenses, but they very rarely get used. I found the build quality going down and the prices going up, while the only feature that they weren't lagging behind in was film sims. The ZF kind of sealed Fujifilms fate for me. Definitely not here to bash Fujifilm, they

I own both and use both as my only digi cams. the ZF is a lot bigger then the x100vi, add in a 24-120 and the difference is huge. They're just different cameras, the x100vi comes with me everywhere, is fun, comes to parties etc, I don't edit the photos off it. The Nikon ZF is huge, but comes with me

I have loads of old lenses for my film cameras. I have adapted them to my Fuji a few times. Tbh though, I ended up buying a Nikon Zf for this purpose. It's super annoying not getting the full field of view on these classic lenses without using speed boosters etc. Full frame is much better for this.

Way overhyped. I can't imagine paying 1800 dollars for a point and shoot that isnt a Leica. And even then it'd be unnecessary. I just bought a full frame mirror less Nikon Zf for about 200 bucks more and its 10x the camera that power shot is.

I upgraded from an X100V to a GFX100RF. For context I also own an A7RiV and a Nikon ZF. For additional context I love the GFX100RF, it’s great fun and very flexible, but from your described use case. I would say it’s likely not going to be the golden bullet you’re making it out to be in your mind. F

I use both systems extensively. I switch between xt5, z8, xt20, xt 30, etc. If you're not a jpeg soc shooter, it's a significant improvement using Nikon. Full frame files from my z8 beat my xt5 images, despite the small difference in megapixels. I'm not sure what raw editor you use, but Lightroom ne