UNAS Pro

the problem here is the Annapurna Cortex A-57, which is what is used in low end QNAP and Synology systems. At least the UNAS Pro 8 has a 10G copper ethernet port. For applications like professional video editing, SSD caching has proven to do nothing - and in fact, slow down a system. I understand th

And the Quad-Core ARM® Cortex®-A57 at 1.7 GHz is still not allowed to rest. Ubiquiti refuses to let it go Edit: As a UNAS Pro owner, I'm disappointed I don't get NVME caching or USB-C connectivity, or the ability to power my NAS via an enormous PoE injector.

global video editing agency ? Future proofing ? And you are in charge of this ? Oh boy. The UNAS Pro 8 is not qualified for professional video editing. You are now speaking to a person that sets up NAS systems for professional video editors and post production facilities, and I use Ubiquiti 10G and

While inaccurate on the software end, I'll just mention that if you're looking to buy it, there may be some considerations from the UNAS lineup. At least previously, the UNAS Pro and UNVR Pro shared hardware within the 2U variant. Recently, the UNAS Pro has received some updates and there is a 1U (P

• It's not pure sine wave, and doesn't work with their own UNAS Pro-You can't change when to send shutdown signal. So it shuts down under a minute. So basically not good for anything better than a few seconds.- Power cycles ALL the outlets to try and turn UDM on. This will obviously cause problems wit

The thing is Ubiquiti is still at a lower price than the QNAPs and Synology running the same or similar SoC. A QNAP TS-832PXU-4G is $939 on Amazon with the same SoC. The UNAS Pro 8 will be $799. The QNAP doesn't come with any NVME sockets and you can't add a 2nd PSU to that model later. You have to

I am going to answer your question in 2 parts, because this will be a long reply. So this is part 1. 10 people is a LOT of people for a small video or production company. A small team is 3 - 4 people. 10 people is a lot of people. You have been given great advice below. I am going to give you detail

Not at all. I don't expect to be saturating 10g often, frankly if at all, but if the device can't handle a isolated test sequential transfer at 10G what does that say for when the CPU actually gets busy with lots of IOPS and sequentials going on all at once? My use case would definitely hit both at

I see what you are saying, I'm not trying to be confrontational as well, let's put aside benchmark with iperf3, let' s go to real use cases. Some native forms of file transfers are single stream, some can use more than one stream, if on single stream the ARM cpu can't handle it, why not offload it t

I have installed tons of QNAP's for professional users. They are rock solid. There are a lot of people that don't know how to install equipment. I see this on reviews - I see this on these forums. I see this about Ubiquiti - people think that they go out and buy a Dream Machine Pro, and some switche