ZR

You mean a rangefinder styled camera? Fujis aren’t rangefinders. Actual good quality rangefinders are very difficult and expensive to manufacture. I don’t think Nikon has it in them. They don’t even have any rangefinder lenses… A ZR with an EVF would be kind neat but it would essentially be the Zf w

Look up Gerald Undones video on the ZR. If you actually work with the camera the FX3/S3 is still a much better option for your workflow and ofcourse lens availability. Having internal RAW is nice but the filesizes are definitely not. ZR had some issues as well with the image quality of smaller files

A Nikon Z-SP, new line of compact lenses, rangefinder/EVF like the 100 but more glass and more bright, very rugged.An upgraded Zr but photocentric.

Blackmagic 6K FF, 6K Pro pros: Better color science, BRAW. 6k pro has built in ND's. 6K FF has beta AF. Blackmagic cons: battery life, heavier, no autofocus (6k pro), low light. Sony FX3 Pros: lightweight, battery life, autofocus, low light king. Sony FX3 Cons: No in-body RAW, color science. Nikon Z

If you can afford it, get the FX5. A bunch of people are saying "you can get something just as good for half the price" talking about the Nikon ZR or the R6V but they're completely wrong. There are no handheld sized video only cameras on the market that do everything the FX5 does. It has NO weak poi

As I’m sure you’re well aware from your own research, there is no wrong choice here. I know that doesn’t exactly help your analysis paralysis, but in regard to solo filmmaking both the R6V and the ZR are fantastic - there is no “better tool” between the two. If you’re asking me, the value propositio

How footage looks to people can be very subjective. Is the footage too sharp? Too soft? Do you want it to look warm straight out of camera or are you grading it in log? Lots of room for things to be subjective. Objectively, though, the S1ii has better overall image quality in the sense it has superi

If we are just talking about bodies, the Canon is the best in my opinion. As a Nikon shooter myself, I am not a big fan of the ZR. What is great about Nikon is that you cam adapt everything to it, even Sony lenses. I would not bux an FX3 to be honest. I think its a solid camera but its incredibly ov

It’s the best value at the price. The only “cons” I see are Z mount and no open gate. Micro HDMI is a head scratcher choice. But those are nitpicks Otherwise everything else for that price point is unbeatable. The only reason I’d take a BMCC 6K over it (whilst BMCC6K costs more) is for open gate, L

Nikon ZR old Nikon Nikkor AI-S lenses is a match made in heaven.