Z f

You shouldn’t care about this. You are pixel peeping extremely. The photos you share on social media (instagram) is at 2MP at max. You are comparing apples to oranges. Fuji cameras you are looking at are APSC. Nikon ZF is Full Frame. If you want perfect details look at Fuji GFX 100s or something (wh

Between just these camera bodies? Fuji. All my controls are within hands reach......and I like a more tactile feel and intentionality. 2) I use mainly apsc nikon bodies (d5500, d3400) and 35mm film cams with a 35 mm prime (now 85 for 2026). My main camera body is beginning to fail after probably an

I've owned both. I sold the X-T5 due to autofocus issues and picked up the ZF. I have no real issue stating the ZF is superior in every way except size/weight, regardless of the X-T5 getting it's autofocus fixed. That being said, the size and weight difference in use is pretty significant. It's visi

I own both and use both as my only digi cams. the ZF is a lot bigger then the x100vi, add in a 24-120 and the difference is huge. They're just different cameras, the x100vi comes with me everywhere, is fun, comes to parties etc, I don't edit the photos off it. The Nikon ZF is huge, but comes with me

I have loads of old lenses for my film cameras. I have adapted them to my Fuji a few times. Tbh though, I ended up buying a Nikon Zf for this purpose. It's super annoying not getting the full field of view on these classic lenses without using speed boosters etc. Full frame is much better for this.

Way overhyped. I can't imagine paying 1800 dollars for a point and shoot that isnt a Leica. And even then it'd be unnecessary. I just bought a full frame mirror less Nikon Zf for about 200 bucks more and its 10x the camera that power shot is.

Fuji is so overpriced compared to Canon or Nikon, their APS-C camera is literally selling the same price as Canon/Nikon full frame gears. The only advantage of Fuji is weight and retro look. But news is that Canon will introduce a retro style full frame camera this year too, if it can be smaller and

Why buy the 16mm 1.8? It’s massive and the same price as a used Fuji 16mm 1.4 This sounds a bit confusing you're making it sound like Fuji 16 1.4 is an alternative option on my Nikon Zf which of course it isn't. I switched to Nikon and so of course I need the full frame version for my Nikon. The 16

Jumped in on Fuji when the X-T2 was new because I got some advice from a friend who is a wedding photographer and he said if you’re going to buy an APS-C kit then go with a company who are all in on APS-C. Stayed with Fuji for years and years but I think after they scored a big hit with the X100v th

I shoot a D3s, I mention it a lot so my apologies to people that have seen my comments before. I bought it just the other year for 500 CAD, with a reasonable shutter count of 57,000. It has not let me down at all as I start doing my own freelance work. But I know for a fact, that once I start making