ER8411

For the most part, everything looks good. If the reason you have your trusted desktop connected to the 10Gb switch with the servers in your DMZ is for high-speed transfers to your PC, then you may run into some issues. Traffic between VLANs is considered "routed" traffic, and must pass through your

Currently I only have 1 omada device in my network stack but it's the core switch of my entire network. The SX3832 - 10gb switch , is the base which connects to another 6 switches throughout my home. The TL-SG1428pe is also in my network rack and used for PoE connected devices, and there's a handful

I personally like my new ER7412-M2 router. I didn't choose the ER8411 because I'll never have 10 gb service here and it was $400 versus $250. I did just replace my OC200 with the OC300 though. If you want to build your own software controller, by all means do so. I just wanted plug-n-play. I suppose

Well, if you ran CAT6 why scrimp on the router? I went with this because I'll never have 10 gbps service nor will I have a need for that. https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1898444-REG/tp_link_er7412_m2_omada_multi_gigabit_vpn.html I couldn't justify the ER8411 for that reason. The Access line of swit

I don't think you are gonna find a router like that, especially one with more than 5 ports AND PoE. Here are two routers to consider: Unifi Cloud Gateway Fiber: 2 Fiber WAN/LAN ports, 5 LAN ports with one PoE+ port TP-Link Omada ER8411: 3 fiber WAN/LAN ports, 8 Ethernet ports, no PoE You can pair on

Dear all, I want to confirm to my friends that I thoroughly reviewed the documentation and received confirmation from TP-Link that I was indeed mistaken. And I'm very happy that TP-Link keeps the Omada line of products accessible to businesses from small to large. This brings significant flexibility

Top switch is sx3008, all other switches are sg3* series. None support OSPF in controller mode, nor am I interested in doing it on the switches at this point. It works on the er8411 in stand alone mode, why has tp-link not incorporated it in controller mode?

I feel your pain. As a new customer I wasted an entire evening trying to get my UXG-Fiber setup with a self hosted local controller. There are a lot of missing key details in their instructions that make them incomplete. Self hosting adds another layer of complexity when replacing the main router as

If you really need it then there's the TP-Link ER8411 at $399. I think you're compounding one bad decision with another if you really look at your use case as a home owner with where you can actually get that speed and what devices would require it. If money isn't a concern though then there's the G

OP never asked "is it worth it" but "will I regret it." If money is the deciding factor, i don't think they would be asking the question. They are stoked over getting 10G fiber. That suggests either they bought into marketing hype or believe they may have a use for that bandwidth, otherwise why pay