Alpha A6300

Almost any camera that can shoot in LOG profile. For example Sony a6300 should be dirt cheap used. Lenses are more important than the camera when basic camera requirements are met. Then the most important thing which makes 90% of the image is lighting. Arri Alexa with 50k€ lens will look worse in sh

I absolutely love my FX30. Started with the Sony a6300 and then switched over to the FX30 when I felt the urge to upgrade. FX30 is indeed, way beyond a starter camera. You won't regret.

Depends on your budget but for only photos Sony a6000-a6300-a6400 are really good only be careful when choosing a lense later always look for something versatile.

I think a 24-105 lens is perfect for backcountry trips. Wide enough for shots of the landscape but you can also zoom in on skiers/riders in action shots. I use a Sony a6300 with the tamron 17-70 (equivalent of ~24-105 for full frame) and love it. I carry it in a hyperlite camera pouch on my hip. Whe

Canon mirrorless overpriced sih. Pilihannya antara sony atau fujifilm aja imo. Sony kalo lu prioritasin autofocus. Fuji kalo prioritasin warna. Budget 8jt jujur gak ada yg punya IBIS. Paling stabilisasi di lensanya aja. Opsinya paling: Sony a6300 + 18-105mm Fuji xt20 + 18-55mm Sony zv1 Action cam gw

I have the a6300, a7ii and a7r4. On the Olympus side, I have the OM-1.ii and E-P7. I don't use the kit lens on the Olympus cameras - I mostly use the 12-40/2.8 PRO. The Sony kit lens is shit, and the kit lenses I have for my older Olympus cameras are excellent, and so are samples I've seen online fo

Very great pictures and amazing journey, so far, thanks for sharing. As a bike AND photography enthusiast, I would recommend you one of the older Sony apsc mirrorless cameras from the alpha 6000 series. If you are really on a budget, a6000 will do. If you have some more to spend, aim for a a6300 or

Sony and OM are a compromise between image quality and telephoto lens options. Sony only has the 70-350, which will give reach a lot like the 70-300 on your GF's a6300, obviously slightly longer. OM has more options, but you have compromises elsewhere to get them (light gathering, etc.) This is a ca

As someone with both M43 and Sony E, Sony E is absolutely not worth it for most people, sure third party lenses are alright but the moment you want a half decent native lens you're screwed with cost, and if you want anything with a fixed aperture better than F4? Sell that kidney. It's so bad that Yo

I would rather look at 2nd hand older mirorless - they are much smaller, usually have much better video capabilities, much better AF coverage and they have nice upgrade options (most dslr systems are abandoned so no new cameras, lenses, etc) In that budget you should be able to easily get 2nd hand S