Alpha A6300

I have the a6300, a7ii and a7r4. On the Olympus side, I have the OM-1.ii and E-P7. I don't use the kit lens on the Olympus cameras - I mostly use the 12-40/2.8 PRO. The Sony kit lens is shit, and the kit lenses I have for my older Olympus cameras are excellent, and so are samples I've seen online fo

I can take a couple test shots between my 700D and my Olympus e-M5 mark 2 later if you want to see differences. Honestly I never use any of my bigget DSLRs anymore, the E-M5 is my go everywhere do everything camera because the IBIS is just so damn good and my Sony A6300 is my event and professional

No I haven't used any Z mount DX camera. I know the Z50II is "weather sealed", but I cannot testify of how resistant it actually is. Sometimes companies say that a model is "weather resistant" while in fact it absolutely isn't. Case in point : Sony claims cameras like the A6300, A6500 and A6400 are

I'm seeing a6100s used for a bit more than that (on eBay in the US but the listings are China based). Pay a lot of attention to the language, a Chinese market a6100 will only be in Chinese (and Japanese and Korean). The a6100 has some substantial advantages over the G100, the downside would be that

I travel 4 to 6 months each year. Stills only. It’s all in comfort yet I still baby my 3 RX100’s. They're gripped with a bottom plate grip similar to the SmallRig, covered in gun grip tape, the top plate, other than the evf is taped along with whatever holes are there, the lens has a Kase mag filter

I have a sony a6300 and a a7iv...terrible ergonomics ! I bought battery grips for both. Also they dont have a real rubbery grip for after a while my hands get sweaty and I loose grip. I also have a PD hand strap. Colors are also not the best. The subjects lean towards the magenta/pink color. I don't

For the PDAF enabled 20MP sensors, not counting the OM-1/OM-3, unlike almost everyone else, it sees detail in both horizontal and vertical axis. How do you take that into account? How about the Nikon D500? The Sony a6300/a6500 was finally starting to match its performance, but Nikon only needed 153

Didn't saw video. But what's the big deal? Took photos with cheap sony a6300 at 3800+meters and didn't even thought that it shouldn't work.