Alpha 7C

Definitely notice this, I think on the Sony side there's sometimes a fair bit of sunk cost fallacy (or sponsorships) making them defensive to where they feel the need to nitpick and downplay positives in other systems to justify their decisions (nobody is asking them to do so though). Blind brand lo

I do genuinely understand some of the criticism; people want a M4/3 camera with all the bells and whistles, that looks stylish, and is something that they can just have in a pocket when they're put and about. I get that; I'd love that myself. But this thing is honestly about as close as you'd get to

Why do you need such great ibis for that use case? I switched from Fuji/sony to Nikon, but I’d probably pick a Sony A7C II or an Fujifilm X-T5 for your use case. The Nikon is much heavier.

I used both and now have sony a7cii + lumix s9 Do you do pro videography? If not, 8 bit is more than fine and I'd tell you to go for the a7c The s5 is a major downgrade in AF, the s9 AF is still worse than the sony (but good overall) but the build quality feels super cheap and then as you said, no e

My advice for any photographer would be to invest more in lenses than the camera body. A camera body will go out of date and depreciate eventually, but a well maintained lens will last you much longer. I assume you're referring to the A7 mark4. It's a good camera. Also consider the A7C mark 2. Which

Yeah, I don't quite understand—with a large body like this, you'd think it'd have weather sealing AND IBIS. Even the Sony a7c ii body is smaller, with all of the above features.

Yeah I think the A7C II is a good target, very similar size (with a grip adding most of the extra size) nearly the same weight. The potential challenge is maintaining the superior IBIS performance with the difference in L-mount vs E-mount dimensions. I'd hope the addition of a grip gives them more i

If low light shooting is a big deal to you, full frame might be worth the trade-off of being more expensive, and having larger and heavier glass. Which is a real thing and sometimes I wish I had more of an APS-C Sony setup to be smaller and lighter. For the most part you can actually have a pretty c

u do realize leica cameras are kinda shit nowadays, right? u're just paying for the name, not the performance. U don't have the sharpness of a sony, or the color accuracy of a nikon, or the autofocus of a sony, or the detail of a hasselblad, leica is no longer a leader in literally anything, it's ju

Wait, what? That's your experience? Mine is the exact opposite. Just rented a Sony a7c with a 20-40mm f2.8. I could not get a sharp handheld shot at 20mm 1/3rd second or slower! I regularly get 1-2 s sharp handheld shots with my three generations behind em5 mark iii (so without any AI built into it)