Alpha 7C

Right, as a fellow Sony 20-70 f/4 owner and M43 shooter, let me share my thoughts… I own the Sony A7C (so, a step up from your A7II) along with the 20-70 f/4, plus a few other lenses. I also have an OM-5 paired with the 12-45 f/4 Pro. When I bought the Sony 20-70 f/4, my intention was to replace the

Sony a6700, Sony a7c(its old but full frame). Get the lens you prefer.

As someone who went from an A7c to an X-T30 mk i, I have not regretted it one bit. Plus, the x-T30 is quite behind when it comes to autofocus, however I have been able to make it work just fine, even while photographing moving kids Fuji also helped me understand color in a way that has truly transfo

Sony rx100 VI for a very capable smaller camera. Sony a7c for a small-ish full frame light camera. Both are fantastic.

my sony a7c ii will take way better pictures than every single phone out there and it's only an entry grade full frame (i bought it because it's compact), now image properly high end full frames and even medium format cameras, phones don't even stand a chance against proper cameras. hell, my old d90

I would go with the Sony A7c; it's not as "film-camera-like" as Fuji but it's very small and full-frame, and almost every kind of lens can be adapted to it. I used Minolta lenses on my Sony cameras for years. The Fuji cameras are APS-C, which means your lenses will have a narrower angle of view. The

I’m a Nikon guy and always found their menus to make more sense to me than other brands. I just picked up a Sony A7c ii though and their new menu system seems more intuitive, really enjoying its compact size for a full frame. APS-C is always where people start but if you have an inkling you’ll get m

No, it's not hard to stick with m43, but it's definitely hard to continue to upgrade bodies when the cost for new OM System cameras is comparable to or higher than many great FF mirrorless cameras from a host of other companies. For the cost of a used OM-3 I opted for a used Sony A7C with a 120 shut