fp Mirrorless

historically the biggest reason to have them have been that they are just small cameras with small lenses while still producing the quality as good as other 35mm cameras. its still partly true to this day. the only competing cameras with rangefinders are either cameras without an evf and often lacki

It's just because of the default rendering of DxO, its contrast curve just happens to pull most of the image down. Here is what the default rendering from Capture One looks like : It's still a bit dark but it was definitely the intent. I took this shot with a Sigma fp, and most experienced owners o

I shoot on Sigma FP L, pretty much the smallest full frame cinema camera existing, the autofocus on that thing is non existent, but it has electronic contacts for modern lenses, unlike this GoPro, I just don't know how your friend is going to use this thing.

I moved from the BMPCC6K Pro and Sigma FP to an FX3 and A7IV. The FP and 6K Pro both have stronger IQ than the FX3, which is why I originally got them, but I was running into a lot of issues as a solo filmmaker and content creator. Trying to film myself or any subject with non autofocusing cameras w

The bigger sensor means lower readout speed so - a bunch of the video features perhaps not being there? What would make sense is the s9r. There's already the sigma fp-l as a proof of concept. And with ibis would be my perfect camera.

Insane combo. It reminds me of the Sigma Fp, a camera I kinda want just because it looks cool 😅

Perfect for Sigma FP L too !

The absolute smallest would be the Sigma fp and an adapter. Everything would be manual though, and it's ridiculously unergonomic for this kind of use.

The Sigma FP and FP L are both smaller than the S9, but they have some quirks. No IBIS is a big one. Bad autofocus is another. I love my FP L, but it’s a very “special” little camera. Everyone saying there are no other options, need to google.

The Sigma FP is a great camera, I'd stick with it for a while longer if you can.