fp Mirrorless

The bigger sensor means lower readout speed so - a bunch of the video features perhaps not being there? What would make sense is the s9r. There's already the sigma fp-l as a proof of concept. And with ibis would be my perfect camera.

Not lots of occasions for me to be smug about my Sigma FP, but that might be one of them lol

+1 for Clever Ghost. He’s the reason I purchased my sigma fp!

I recommend YouTube. I spent a lot of time interested in Sigmas, FP, FPl, the new one. It seems to me almost entirely everyone I watch that even start out loving it moves on and has a lot of complaints.

The Sigma FP is a great camera, I'd stick with it for a while longer if you can.

Thank you for detalied review! I got the TTArt 40f2 just 10 days ago and loving it so far on my Sigma FP L and Lumix S9, I was thinking to get the SGimg too especially for the FP L and this review helped me to decide, thank you again!

I believe both cameras use SONY sensors so colors are pretty similar. The only practical difference is that photos take a little bit longer to write on the FP-L due to the very large file size. For YouTube videos and the vast majority of photo needs, the FP and BF’s 24~ megapixel sensor is more than

There are some options. It depends on your needs. For the native mount mainly Panasonic and Leica lenses. But you can even get IS with adapted EF-lenses. There can be FPs found for around 700-800$ locally. Check out the Sigma FP user groups on Facebook. The used prices have gone up since they discon

I think the S9 is best recommended as a b cam or a c cam. I feel similarly about the Sigma fp, for the right price.

Really nice! I'm not a filmmaker, I mainly take photographs, and I must admit that I recently discovered the Sigma Fp L and am very intrigued by it. I'm curious to know what accessories you use for filming, in addition to the camera.