OM-D E-M10 Mark II

Senior Vice President Tazuhiro Togashi and Director of Product Planning Hiroki Koyama Not exactly "OM Reps". That suggests some low grade Marketoid. These "dudes" are "nosebleeder" - called that because they are so high up in the company, the thin air up there could cause nosebleeds. So these statem

Hi, the E-M10III is still a great camera. I personally use an E-M10II for EDC and it's still a great little body. Now, if most of your photography is travel etc, I could probably see how you could benefit for an upgrade, especially when it comes to the new capabilities of the newer sensors and proce

Only you can answer that question as far as cost vs. benefits go, but an OM-5 ii, OM-5, or E-M5 iii sounds like a good upgrade for you. It is a very similar feel, size and layout as your current camera. The controls and handling will be familiar. All the cameras mentioned above have in-camera chargi

Maintenant, en réalité, le plus gros facteur limitant va être tes objectifs. Le 14-42 et le 40-150 sont super compacts et pas mauvais en soi, mais peu lumineux. J’ai aussi commencé avec ce combo, et c’est parfait pour tester et faire ses armes, mais tu risques de vite te sentir un peu bloqué à un mo

Yeah, no. Unbalanced isn't a thing here. Try a 75-300 mm on an E-M10 Mark II. That's unbalanced. An OM-5 has good ergonomics. I bought my G95 for that reason. Similar in size and handling to the Olympus 5-series.

I had an E-M10 (the original) for years and just upgraded to an E-M1 mark iii. I'm really happy with the decision; it's just a much sturdier camera to hold in the hands; its more balanced if you have the heavier zoom lens; it has tons of great capabilities and a much longer battery life. It also has

For a total beginner I'd say look out for an E-M10 mark II and go with that. It's small, feels great in the hand with good stabilisation and stills autofocus in good light, and comes in substantially cheaper a lot of the time - I see them to for 150-200€ regularly and it's easily worth that even if

The OM-3 is probably the wrong camera. I'd get an OM-5 Mark II and the lens. My suspicion (based on photos) is that the OM-3 has worse ergonomics than your M10.1. Which, I agree, probably needs replacement at this point. My E-M10 Mark II probably could stand replacement at this point.