X-T5

I worked as a photographer for ~40 years. In 2013 I switched from Canon FF to Fujifilm, because I needed lighter weight equipment to continue to be physically able to work. The early Fuji cameras had fine image quality but terrible autofocus and user interfaces. But those things improved and the ima

Considering there will always be more hobbyists than pros, I don’t think that’s really the issue. The camera companies can’t exist without them and the sales numbers will always skew more towards hobbyists than pros solely because of the sheer number of camera consumers as a whole vs working profess

Get a Fujifilm and call it your creative therapist. There's an awesome community for film simulations and if you are only shooting to capture memories, it's a great camera system for that. I have the X-T5 and an Sony A7RIVA for both purposes. Great images for paying clients too. Cheaper than full fr

You take great pictures, the camera doesn't. I will always say buy the Leica just because hahaha everyone should have a Leica :) You can upgrade to a lot of things from the X-T5, but your eyes are set on Leica for whatever reason. With all that said, do you need autofocus? Q or SL Don't mind manual

I also contemplated these very same options, and I chose the X-T5. The X-T5 is more than all the features you listed, it is access to the entire Fujifilm X-System. The body, sensor and user experience of the X-T5 are only half the reason for my purchase; the X Mount prime lenses were the other. The

I just jumped from Fuji XF (X-T5) to Nikon FX (Z5 ii). I loved Fuji, shot it for nearly 5 years, and owned almost all of their lenses at one point or another. So why did I move to Nikon? Because I found that 95% of my shooting with my Fuji (as opposed to my Ricoh pocket cams) was either in service o

Depends on your hands and the lens you use. I think the OM1 and all similar bodies (em1) are the right size for bigger handed people. I use a G9M2 which is the biggest weather sealed M43 camera I also have an OM5 which is a lot smaller, but when I pair it with the 12-40mm f2.8 pro, it feels strange

I'm a fan of the 23mm wr f2. It's pretty decent quality and not large in any way. And it's very fun to shoot due to its design (can't quite explain that but it is). At 35mm fov, it's super versatile. You can use the digital zoom on the x-t5 and increase your composition choices for a prime and the 4

Ta! This was on a Fujifilm X-T5 and a Viltrox 27mm f/1.2. Fantastic lens, but a bit large and heavy.

For me it comes down to a combo of which camera feels more natural for me to use, and which has lenses I want to use. I like Fujifilm images but prefer the feel of OM-System cameras and their controls. I could probably get used to Fujifilm though. More importantly, the lenses for m43 have a large se