X-T5

I worked as a photographer for ~40 years. In 2013 I switched from Canon FF to Fujifilm, because I needed lighter weight equipment to continue to be physically able to work. The early Fuji cameras had fine image quality but terrible autofocus and user interfaces. But those things improved and the ima

Autofocus, hands down the OM-1II will obliterate any Fujifilm at this time. It's not even funny. Fujifilm is plagued with something worse than bad autofocus, false positives. Imagine seeing green AF confirmation squares, finishing a shoot, and coming back to see 30% of your shots are out of focus. B

There are some pros on YouTube who shoot weddings with Fujifilm X bodies. You should check them out. I would use my full frame bodies if I ever took on a wedding, mainly because I trust the autofocus more on them than I do with my Fuji X bodies. I hope that Fuji will improve their AF with another fi

I also contemplated these very same options, and I chose the X-T5. The X-T5 is more than all the features you listed, it is access to the entire Fujifilm X-System. The body, sensor and user experience of the X-T5 are only half the reason for my purchase; the X Mount prime lenses were the other. The

I use both systems extensively. I switch between xt5, z8, xt20, xt 30, etc. If you're not a jpeg soc shooter, it's a significant improvement using Nikon. Full frame files from my z8 beat my xt5 images, despite the small difference in megapixels. I'm not sure what raw editor you use, but Lightroom ne

I just jumped from Fuji XF (X-T5) to Nikon FX (Z5 ii). I loved Fuji, shot it for nearly 5 years, and owned almost all of their lenses at one point or another. So why did I move to Nikon? Because I found that 95% of my shooting with my Fuji (as opposed to my Ricoh pocket cams) was either in service o

Even compared to the Z50, I'd say the Fujifilm AF system in their latest cameras leaves something to be desired, especially in terms of reliability (and I say that as someone owned/used Fuji for work from the X-T2 through the X-T5). Agreed there are some enticing Sigma lenses (both FF and APS-C), bu

Short answer: Yes, Fuji is enough. I shoot documentary family, event and wedding photography on Fuji and the smaller size and retro style are great for my documentary style (the camera is perceived as less intrusive). That said, I have upgraded to the X-T5 at some point for the considerably better A

That really depends on who you ask. I haven’t personally used the X-E5, but I can share my experience with Fuji cameras in general. Keep in mind this is just my personal take. ​While I love the design and the out of the box colors, I’m honestly not a Fuji fanboy. I’ve used the X-S10 and X-T5 and bot

Canon/Nikon/Sony dominate the pro market, but Fujifilm isn't absent, and they are much more represented in some particular niches ("fine art wedding photography," (both in the wannabes and the good ones), being one). They're also strong among documentary/street photographers that get published. Fuji