EOS R7

Here is what I don’t get; CG knew Relic Delta was gonna be disliked and have really poor reception, so they had a group of play testers release that info for them to soften the blow and tweak it (even if it was for show) to make it more digestible… but they didn’t foresee with the Era Content? They

Hi fellows,

Though I'm a Canon user, even for a brief time since I'm just a new hobbyist, I've always wanted to have a Fujifilm camera, even before my first professional camera purchase (Canon EOS R7). You know, stuff like both aesthetically and functionally retro design, film simulations, 3rd-part

Sony RX10 ist ein super Teil für den Einstieg und wenn du eher nicht upgraden wirst Die Canon R7 wäre als Systemkamera deutlich zukunftssicherer falls du später mal planst doch mehr zu investieren. Das Setup kannst du mit einem 100-500 L oder 200-800 nämlich noch ausbauen. Wenn du dich für Canon ent

Hi. Long time wildlife photographer here. You can see my work from my instagram where you can find photos and videos similar to what you are looking for. Metin Kastro (@metinkastro_wildlife) • Instagram photos and videos Now coming to your question... I would recommend you the R7 from Canon, roughly

I love my canon r7. I got it for around $250 at a pawn shop. I was given a 75-300mm lens by a friend who never used it. Its awesome but I want to start saving for a longer lens.

Wenn du bei Canon bleiben möchtest, dann wäre eine gebrauchte EOS R7 eine sehr gute Wahl, aber noch recht teuer. Alternativ, wenn es auch eine DSLR sein darf, eine gebrauchte EOS80D, beides APS-C Modelle. Wichtiger wäre da noch das Objektiv, die R Mount sind noch recht teuer, die älteren EF Objektiv

Canon Eos R7 + RF100-400 would cost less than $2k USD and is a good entry point for wildlife photography. Check out r/canon and do a search for rf100-400 there

Z50ii is on the same level as a Canon R10 or R7. The R50 is a cut down R10. I own an R10 but favor Nikon for full frame. I got the R10 because it was cheap (at the time, no longer) and small, but has poor battery life. The image quality of the R10 is ho-hum. I bought the 10-18mm lens and it's underw

55-210 is not good enough in most cases (small reach). My friend has 70-350mm and he's jelous of my additional reach. I'm using R7 with RF100-400mm which is (4001,6) effectively 640mm while 350mm on Sony is (3501,5) effectively 525mm. I'm biased as Canon user but I feel like R7 + RF100-400mm is insa

I second this for the r7 (no, I don't shoot canon lol). It's so feature rich and built for wildlife. Apsc, 33mp (don't see a lot of those), 15fps. Canon is a good ecosystem for wildlife, lots of lens choices (I kinda regretted going sony for this reason, but with apsc the 70 350 is great). The r7 is