EOS R6 Mark II

Here's a technical comparison https://www.rtings.com/camera/tools/compare/canon-eos-r6-mark-ii-vs-nikon-z-6iii/36079/51765?threshold=0.16 Photography wise they're both excellent and will come down to preference of what feels better in your hands and which UI you prefer If you have interest in video

Για κάποια πράγματα ναι, για κάποια άλλα, όχι. Πήραμε στο studio ένα Mac mini studio M4 Max που τρέχει τη σουίτα της Adobe, πολύ καλύτερα από το τούμπανο PC που έχουμε (Lenovo P620 - threadripper 3955 με 128gb ram και μια Rtx A5000) σε ένα κουτί που το βάζεις πάνω στο γραφείο και δεν ακούγεται καθόλ

I will buy it. My R6 is getting old and I am doing more weddings now and want a second camera body rather than just renting one to have redundant equipment when I shoot a wedding. My only real disappointments with the announcement: No real improvement in the sensor read out speed from the mark ii. I

I have good news on the first point, my friend: Canon isn't claiming any particular technological leaps with this sensor, but our initial testing shows that it has even faster readout speeds than the lower-resolution chip found in the EOS R6 II. The R6 III has some truly impressive rolling shutter r

-good for nature shots Almost any camera with a good or OK lens can shoot landscapes in good light. -good for day/night city and building shots Night shooting with good results requires either a very sensitive (expensive and large) sensor or a long exposure from a tripod. Buildings require either e

I have a 13 Pro Max and rarely record on 4K. my regular camera is a Canon R6 MK II which handles 4K very well. The end viewer doesn’t really care about 1080 versus 4K and 90% of the people couldn’t tell the difference if you put them side-by-side. As far as processing things, 4K takes up a lot more

For indoor sports especially, FF is a game changer. The R6ii is probably you're best "budget" (for some definition of budget...) option in the Canon lineup. I was very happy shooting basketball with the original R6 and an adapted EF 70-200 f/2.8. I'm even happier now with an R5ii and the RF 70-200,

I like the cropping capabilities of the R5 and their use in studio work, but the large file sizes are mostly a hassle, and thus the reason I was interested in the R6's. file size isn't the priority, what you want is the best autofocus for sports, which always means fully stacked sensors, like the r3

I haven't shot with either, but honestly, if you're happy with Zf, the Z5II is basically the same camera with better ergonomics, but without the cool retro styling. Z6III is, from what I've read, better in some ways, worse in others. Specifically, the partially stacked sensor is good enough to shoot

Just download some that are similar to what you shoot, and see if you can get the colors to look the way you like for various objects (landscapes, plants, skin tones, etc.) Honestly, if you like the m6, I’d consider an R6 or R6 mk ii. You won’t notice a huge difference in resolution. It’s something