EOS R6 Mark II

Here's a technical comparison https://www.rtings.com/camera/tools/compare/canon-eos-r6-mark-ii-vs-nikon-z-6iii/36079/51765?threshold=0.16 Photography wise they're both excellent and will come down to preference of what feels better in your hands and which UI you prefer If you have interest in video

Για κάποια πράγματα ναι, για κάποια άλλα, όχι. Πήραμε στο studio ένα Mac mini studio M4 Max που τρέχει τη σουίτα της Adobe, πολύ καλύτερα από το τούμπανο PC που έχουμε (Lenovo P620 - threadripper 3955 με 128gb ram και μια Rtx A5000) σε ένα κουτί που το βάζεις πάνω στο γραφείο και δεν ακούγεται καθόλ

I will buy it. My R6 is getting old and I am doing more weddings now and want a second camera body rather than just renting one to have redundant equipment when I shoot a wedding. My only real disappointments with the announcement: No real improvement in the sensor read out speed from the mark ii. I

I use Canon Mirrorless at work (R6ii) and shoot Nikon for myself for 10+ years. The canon is nice, for sure, better AF than the Mk 1 and 2 z6's, it can do 4k60 with almost no crop, very capable hybrid. Colors are pretty good, a bit cold overall. Lenses are nice, but the ecosystem is pretty locked of

I switched from a73 to r6ii. A73 was revolutionary at the time, but its been a long time since and Canon has caught up and new tech is noticably better. Sure you get more lens selection, but IMO, once you get the gear you like, you dont really use a variety of lenses Id rather take better noise redu

Shooting a basketball doc right now with the C400, C50, and the Komodo X sometimes. The C400 and C50 are magic together and I assume the c80 as well. The codecs are beefy, the image is instantly gorgeous, and the bodies are miles above the fx6/fx3 for flexibility. The canon cinema cameras let me sho

Die Hasselblad ist komplett ungeeignet wenn man kaum Erfahrung hat, auch für viele Leute die Professionell arbeiten ist diese Kamera nichts da sie riesen Daten erzeugt und auch extrem teuer im Unterhalt ist was Objektive angeht.Die Leica ist halt ne Leica, kostet viel und hat einen gewissen Prestige

People usually DM and ask me, so I started including it. The R6ii is hardly "fancy" it's a standard full frame mirrorless at this point, it's 4 years old. I'd argue this is on the lower end of full frame at this point for the canon line vs the R5 / R3 / R1. The lens was shared because it's an old M4

I have good news on the first point, my friend: Canon isn't claiming any particular technological leaps with this sensor, but our initial testing shows that it has even faster readout speeds than the lower-resolution chip found in the EOS R6 II. The R6 III has some truly impressive rolling shutter r

THE REGRET (huge lettering): Buying Canon R6 II for better AF, after two decades of Nikon....... Canon is plain terrible on too many details. Can't live without: Z8 + Plena. Everything I do, I do with that combo... When there is a wider need, I just grab Tamron 28-75mm G2.. Enough.