UNAS Pro

A couple of things to note about the Ubiquiti ecosystem: There is NO documentation. You are required to figure out things on your own, ask reddit, ask Ubiquiti community forums, watch influencer dudes on youtube. You are also the official beta tester, because Ubiquiti releases new products fast and

• It's not pure sine wave, and doesn't work with their own UNAS Pro-You can't change when to send shutdown signal. So it shuts down under a minute. So basically not good for anything better than a few seconds.- Power cycles ALL the outlets to try and turn UDM on. This will obviously cause problems wit

The NVME cache seems to have no usefulness for you based on your usage. UI's implementation of it isn't the best either. I would not switch the UNAS Pro for the Pro 4 unless you desperately need the 1U of rack space back: Both are $499. You'll have to deal with the return, and possibly a restocking

My personal choice, is to use a dedicated machine for the cameras, like the UNVR. I don't like to burden the firewall/router with Protect and when I'm playing around with the UNVR it won't affect the rest of the network (like a reboot won't bring the whole internet down). This also makes it easier t

I purchased my EFG last year around this time and it did come with the 64GB of memory (so it must have been after the first wave of EFGs that shipped with the smaller memory size). As much as I like the EFG product as a whole, the performance has always been lacking and I have not been happy after d

The pi 5 uses the a76 at 2.4ghz. which is better than the unas pro a57 1.7ghz. even the pi 4 has the a72 which is above it. Ubiquiti snuck quite an old processor in there lol. But it seems fine for just Nas duties. But the cost of a whole pi set up these days for diy is somewhat less worth it especi

Unas pro is rack mount, thats a no. Unas 4 is out of stock, and vs the Asustor a worse CPU, un-upgradable ram and 2 fewer NVMe slots with trays not included.Is the Ubiquiti software that much better? I have nothing else Ubiquiti so no benefit there. Overall seems not worth the $50 in savings.

id like the ability to have drives of varying sizes (because i dont feel like dropping 2k on 7 20 TB drives) and then as time goes on, start replacing smaller drives with new bigger ones and then having the Raid adjust the available size while maintaining redundancy. Synology does it with SHR. i sta

yes - I have installed two TS-1655 systems. With a TS-1655, you still have to add a 10G card, RAM (4G ain't enough) and the 12 drives and 2 SSD's. So it's still not "cheap". I am not a fan of the ATOM Intel CPU, but it works, and it's sure a hell of a lot better than the Annapurna CPU's. I recently

Ubiquiti as a company operates in this middle ground between consumer and hyper enterprise where they can have a management system for networking, while not being Cisco level of cost. Granted you get slightly less features, but the ability to self host and manage your stuff is the trade off in an en