ILCE6600/B

Pixel, iPhone, Galaxy S - bei den Flaggschiffen (muss auch nicht zwingend die neuste Generation sein) ist man bei der Kameraqualität tendenziell nicht schlecht bedient. Schau dir da einfach online Vergleichsbilder an welche dir besser gefallen. Hab selber ein Pixel 9 und bin mit der Kamera sehr zufr

If you don't mind not buying Fuji, you can look at the Sony a6600 (currently ~ ₹57,000) but routinely is below ₹55,000.

Between the two: XT5 However the Sony is a bit jank as you have picked an expensive Full frame G 24mm lens just for weather sealing to pair with an older APSC A6600 body. Another choice would be A7CII with G 40mm if you stretch the budget or find a good deal on grey or second hand.

A6600 is a very good camera. Avoid the kit lens. You can also get a7iii or a7c at around 80-85k used. But better buy new a6600. (I like my devices new, sorry). Keep in mind that a6600 is officially discontinued by Sony.

Look so here's the deal with your budget. It gets you in but not far. You'll get great images from any of the big systems out there, here's a basic guide: Canon: known for warm colors, but you can't buy cheap lenses as they don't allow em, only official canon lenses available. Sony: colors are not t

If your focus is wildlife, the Sony 70-350mm f/4.5-6.3 is a better lens (sharper, better AF performance, good optical stabilisation). It's quite an expensive lens (by APS-C standards), but often goes on sale (on Amazon and elsewhere). Maybe get it with a used A6600, to keep within budget, though aut

All these comments are just ppl telling you to buy used and only one actually answers your question 😭 I was also considering the a6600 for a while but ended up saving up and preordering a Nikon Z5ii since I’m not gonna do sports all that much. Sony cams would also be better for sports since the auto

If you’re worried about size then definitely look for a used Sony a6400 with the kit lens which should fall exactly at this price point with under 15k shutter count. Any other Sony a6000+ can also work. The only one that is better than the a6400 is the a6600, which usually go for closer to 800. (And

The other commenter has mentioned the basics but the caveat with "professional" cameras is the images pretty much always have to be edited for them to look "ready". Phone apps have come a long way now but essentially a dedicated camera will produce images that are more "flexible", as in they withsta

I think an APS-C or OM Systems micro 4/3 option could be good. The lens systems are cheaper and lighter weight than full-frame equivalents, but the image quality can easily outperform smartphones, making them good for beginners. All of the cameras I am going to suggest are weather-sealed, which filt