Alpha FX3

Lmaoooo 🤣🤣🤣 thanks for this comment made me feel better about the situation! The worst part! Is I went out of way to for this wedding I rented out a Sony fx3 because I wanted to get the best image quality possible.

Sony FX3/FX6 or Canon C50/C80/C400. Travelling with bigger cameras, especially those that require a bit of putting together, is a pain in the ass. Not impossible, of course, but having done a bit of travel work (and shot many music videos that could easily have been shot on an FX3 with no compromise

An S1ii costs less than an FX3 and outperforms it. If I didn't have Sony glass I'd take that over an FX3 or FX30 any day (I'm still shooting Sony with over 1k paid gigs done on an a7siii/FX3 so not a Panasonic shill, just being objective)

Saying an fx3 let alone an fx30 delivers a better image than a ursa g2 is so far from reality. The Ursa has one of the best latitudes for a S35 sensor, build in ND's, RAW flexibility and overall a better user interface. The image quality outperforms both the fx3 and fx30 in lab tests. Media options

The FX3 has a lower MP sensor with larger pixels which reduces rolling shutter and can record in basically any framerate. The FX3's image will look better. Personally, I take Lumix cameras over Sony

No, but I'm using it as an A camera and FX3 as a B camera now. A7v is better in nearly every way except the fan but I've shot hours long interviews and live shows with the a7v and never had any heat warning. The only other thing is the fx3 has cineEI and shutter angle. CineEI is easily replicated wi

Long time Canon shooter but I’d get Sony for sports. The C80 image is totally different than the C70, and for the worse in my opinion. It’s not a bad look but it’s definitely sharper and less organic feeling. The autofocus is a million times better though, along with other qol improvements. I see a

Honestly the X-H2S is a great camera and in some ways has a better image/video specs than either Sony (open gate, 6K, ProRes or high data rate H265, great color). The biggest improvement you’ll notice is autofocus (Fuji AF is terrible) but the lenses are bigger and more expensive. If you do get a So

I know the FX6 has some cine body niceties like internal ND, SDI, etc, but I view the FX3 as basically a full sibling to the FX6 that embraces slightly different compromises. I don’t think of it as a lower tier really… FX3… You lose internal ND, but you gain stabilization. You lose some ports that a

What evidence points to you believing there will be an fx3 mk2? Search the history here and like every other post is something exactly like this. Nobody knows, but it's more likely they update the fx6 before. The fx3 is a great camera, even if a mk2 comes out. If you have "new camera" money and need