Alpha 7 IV

No. Skip the junk bundle. A7iv (if you really want it) + Sony or sigma 24-70 will carry you far.

If you’re on the fence of selling, might want to sell now before the market floods with used A7iv once everyone gets their A7V delivery. That being said the A7iv is a workhorse for client projects, treat it as such and use a different solution for creative projects.

As a wedding photographer, I always look at their gear when I pass by them during races. Karamihan naka A7iv and 50gm 1.2 for closer shots then naka 70-200 for zoomed in photos. Tapos may battery powered Nanlite or Amaran lights pa. Their whole setup costs 300k easily. I’d say 200 per photo is fair

Both are excellent option. You should look which system offers you lenses you need. Between a7iv and z5ii I would argue it's hard to beat the value z5ii offers for the money. But if you want access to all that sony glass and sigma f1.4 (we prob won't see nikon S f1.4 lenses) then go sony. Imo betwee

👆👏 In addition, to help OP’s decision, I will offer one word to describe each camera A7CII: small A7IV: old Z7ii: megapixels Z5ii: a bargain

Dead on arrival… 🫤 So I’ve been digging into the upcoming Sony FX2, and I’m honestly struggling to understand who this camera is supposed to be for. It feels like Sony just slapped the A7IV’s guts into a slightly different body, called it “cinema,” and bumped the price up. With an expected price of

Cotswoldcameras for example. I've ordered a A7 IV and two Sony lenses from there, which were well under the price for a used piece of gear. EU btw, and I've had no trouble with customs. The only downside is that the warranty is only covered in the country the retailer is from, which is Hong Kong, bu

Sony A7IV. But any decent mirrorless camera will do the job.

Sell the FX3A and use the money to buy an A7RV if you strictly are for stills, or the A7V if you want to take great stills but also have some solid video features. Or you could go for like an A7RIV or A7IV and pick up a nice piece of glass with the leftover cash.

The S5ii is curiously the cheapest one of them all…otherwise in my honest opinion. The 33 mp are a nice upgrade over the 24 and yes the autofocus is a bit stickier. But the LUMIX is identical and better in some parts (LUTs, Displays, IBIS). I use my S5ii for Nature and wildlife and it’s a really rel