a7R II

I have beaten this drum to death by now but I went A7R2 -> Z7II w/Viltrox E-Z for about 4 months. Mid June sold the Z7II for a Z8. I shared your sentiment for disdain towards spending a metric ton just to shoot decent FPS on Sony, not to mention CFe A vs B. Ultimately it was a mix of that, having to

I mainly shoot portrait/fashion + landscape (during travels), but recently I started trying my hands on bird photography with my GFX 100s II. It's not a good experience, I mean I can shoot stationary or slow moving birds, but the AF is just not very responsive and bad accuracy in high speed and high

Neither is going to just get you that. I mean both can get you eye details and such sure... But the focal depth is razor thin. What you posted is stacked. Get the Sony if you plan to run about snapping bugs on the go. AF and IS make quick shots much easier. A top flash with diffuser will let you sto

Ma moj setup je sada : A7R2 iA7IIIAli nemam zoom nista na zalost :Imam 18 Samyang 2.8fe24 Tamron 2.828 -70 3.5-5.6 Sledece mi je :Sony Zeiss 55mm F 1.8TAMRON 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VC VXD G2 Al sam video da imas i Tamron 150-500MM, kako se pokazao za prirodu ? Ti se fotkanjem bavis ili hobi ? :)

pixel area almost doesn't matter, sensor technology matters way way way more that's why 48mpx sony a7s iii can be marketed as 12 and people don't care (it's using quad bayer, like phones, but advertises resolution after downsampling, since you can't pull full res photos from it)... and also why sony

I have the S1R as well as a G8 (as well as the S5). I use the S1R pretty much exclusively at ISO 100 for landscapes. And at ISO 100 the DR is quite good. It is not quite as good as the 42mp sony sensors (a7r2 and a7r3), but the difference is marginal and not i real use not a point of concern IMO (ma

Another fun example of this , the Sony A99ii has the exact same 42 megapixel sensor as the A7R2. This means the A7, A7ii, A9 and A9ii all have a worse sensor than the last Sony DSLR.

Hey yall !! I was just wondering if a used Sony A7R II or a Canon EOS R50 would be more worth it for me. I’m quite a beginner in photography and currently have a Canon EOS SL3 with the kit lens. As of now, I’ve only really done a bit of landscape photography, but want to start doing concert photogra

why would af matter with m42 lenses? original s5, sony a7r2 are low end and have good image quality. don’t expect to get sth at this budget level that can do 4k 60 for a whole match(why would you even need that?) on full frame. that shit is heavy. but the two cameras i mentioned are pretty good and