A6400

Sony A6400, Sigma 16-300 lens.

Photo 1: f9.0 1/2500 iso800 Photo 2: f8.0 1/800 iso2000 Photo 3: f5.6 1/800 iso2500

I know the iso is a little higher on the last 2 pictures. Is this just to be expected when shooting on a more budget setup?

Andromeda taken from a bortle 4 sky with a new moon, with a Sony a6400 attached to the skywatcher evostar 72ed telescope. 120 lights for 45 seconds at ISO 800, only lights, without darks or flats. The tracking mount that I have used is the skywatcher star adventurer 2i, I used the dithering function

Is there any reason for the switch? They sre basically the same camera but with the a6400 builth with better materials and a viewfinder (and maybe weather sealing?), otherwise the E10 is the more latest of the two sporting gyro data recording and a type-c port

I use the Sony a6400 and that thing is a workhorse with a large variety of affordable lenses. Very approachable price point and weight, phenomenal photos.

È la prima volta che fotografo delle auto. Sfortunatamente erano quasi tutte all'interno di un'area recintata, quindi la composizione era quasi obbligata.

Ho usato una Sony Alpha 6400 con un Sony 18-135. Ho preso tanta pioggia ma credo ne sia valsa la pena.

Go with the R50. For lenses, Canon's RF-S lineup is straightforward. The kit 18-45mm covers learning and content creation, the 55-210mm handles events, and the 50mm f/1.8 takes care of portraits when paid gigs start. Simple roadmap. Sony's E-mount actually wins on glass. The Sigma 16mm, 30mm, and 56

I've been stuck on this dilemma for way too long. Here's the thought process.
I've been looking for a travel / edc camera which is also my first camera. I probably will be sticking with this camera for a very long time, likely not even changing from the kit lens. Also note that I live in a Southea

I love that camera colors, and hate its focus I'm not sure what brought you to get A7III specifically, another great option for a starter camera is Sony A6400 which you can find around 700 used, and still have enough money to get a used Sigma 56mm 1.4 or 30mm 1.4, this combination is extremely good

I would keep the a6400 for now and go with better lenses: - Sigma 18-50 2.8 or Tamron 17-70 2.8 to get wide+mid shots - Sony 70-200 2.8 or Tamron 70-180 2.8 These will get you covered for Wedding photography Once you are able to gather money from wedding gigs go for a full frame Sony option like the

ChatGPT is often a word salad mess of misinformation. Don't rely on it. That's the Sony multi-interface (MI) foot for the MI hotshoe. That's also the newer, slimmer Godox "metal" footplate version that should fit in newer E-mount bodies better than the older "plastic" version. Also less prone to bre