A6000

Ich habe im Studium viel mit Sony Kameras gearbeitet (a6000, A7, FX3) und mein Fazit war bei der Marke immer „Technisch gut (auf dem Datenblatt - aber macht null Spaß zu benutzen. Schreckliche Menüs und furchtbare Ergonomie.“ Bin nun fast 10 Jahre mit Fuji unterwegs und nutze das System auch berufli

I had an a6000 for 10 years before switching to an OM-5 mk.II last year, best decision ever. To be honest, most of the 10 years I had the a6000 I was in a photography "hiatus" because of mainly personal reasons but, when I decided to start taking pictures again last year, I started struggling again

Sony A6000. I think as used to Nikon controls and just couldn’t get used to the change.

"I’m just looking for an affordable camera that takes awesome pics" The camera won't do that. The photographer does that. its a 12 year old camera. capable of good images. in general, i found all Sony cameras that I tried from around that time period to have difficult ergonomics/user interface. I fo

Considering the specs and features, I would compare the a6700 to the OM-3, not the OM-5. The OM-3 costs more but has a fully-stacked sensor, it's a bit larger than the Sony but weighs the same. The Sigma 18-50 is not comparable to the Oly/OM 12-40 f2.8. The Sigma's focal length starts at 28mm equiva

For 1200 (USD?), you could get a Tamron 150-500 for your A6000. A powerful lens, but heavy. Image quality wise, I think the A6000 would do fine, but the AF isn't quite as good as on today's cameras. If you consider additional upgrades in the future, the Sony system is pretty good, for example you co