MK4S

You can sell it, there is probably some customer base with mk3 and mk4 that may consider it for right price. I believe for various reasons enclosure for mk4 was really dead end. The Biggest issue is to volume you have to heat up, location of the printed part on the bottom due to printer construction

As a XL owner, im sad that they did not release a XL+ performance upgrade to fix issues and improve performance. Also I'm a little disappointed that it's so hard to track subtle improvements as there is no obvious revision list. I have tried to track the printable repository for printed parts and up

Just upgraded from the Mk4s to the core one. If you can wait, get the core one. Smaller foot print, faster, and print quality seems better. That being said, the Mk4s is still a really strong printer. I had the original enclosure for the mk4s and it was bulky. 3-4 weeks for a new release with Prusa i

I "tested" it myself. It's not a scientific test tho. I just can compare the same print with filter on and off on my air particle monitor in HomeLab. The "enclosure" of the C1(L) is not fully sealed. As Prusa said themself. The additional filtration in the back can either suck the chamber temperatur

they weren't pretty. I blame that on the leaky original prusa enclosure not being able to maintain heat reliably. i'm hoping that with a stable 85c chamber that part quality, detail and complexity will be improved. on my mk4s i used metacollins HT firmware. the current core one+ is a home brew firmw

Espacially in my home office room, I meassure it all the time. And I can heavily smell ASA prints even hours after a print. This room is pretty warm in even in winter and still, the filtration when set to auto runs on minimum settings all the time because the C1L can't keep the heat (and I already s

Does anyone have the actual CAD models of the original top cover from Prusa? I thought these things were supposed to be open source? I like this design, but i'm finding that additional bends in the PTFE tubing causes problems with stiffer materials like PA6-CF. And those are the ones where I specifi

Hi. I'm an artist. Prusa MK4S is the best I've found for detailed PLA printing. That said it has a relatively small build volume at 250x210x220. I tend to just slice things into pieces and glue them with dowels if I need anything larger. Prusa also offers upgrade paths. For instance you can turn an

I operate multiple Prusa and Bambu Maschinen and no, you do not do something wrong. Prusas these days are not close in technical capabilities to Bambu. And I know that this will, just like on your post, cause a downvote storm - as usual on fanboy subs. What does Prusa worse: No camera (this shitty W