Z6III FX-format Mirrorless Camera Body

TL;DR: If you’re coming from a Canon T7 and want pro-level autofocus without the $2,500+ price tag of a Z6 III or A7 IV, the Nikon Z5 II is the move. 1.Better "Brains" than Sony (The AF Argument) While Sony has historically led the AF game, the Z5 II inherited the EXPEED 7 processor from the flagshi

Nikon Z6III, Tamron 28-75 f2.8 and the ultra wides is the Laowa 12mm f2.8. It was actually pretty difficult using the f2.8 zoom and I really regretted not bringing my 1.4 35mm and 50mm but still got some good photos!

The z8 and z9 are the mirrorless flagships. They will be the best Nikon has to offer (at present). It sounds more like user error on the z6iii. You should not be getting worse results with it. Any chance you bought it secondhand?

I came from Fuji X-H2s as well, and now have 2 x S1ii's. I agree that the S1RII should have the Z8/Z9 sensor and cost whatever it needs to. By using the slower sensor, Panasonic is holding back that model. Its just not fast enough. However, the partially stacked sensor in the S1ii is better than you

I bought the Z8 before the Z6iii was ever announced, and when the Z6iii did make it out never had an afterthought. The only thing to me that would have been noticeably different is the EVF, but that’s not a dealbreaker as I happen to like 46Mpxl and that’s not possible with the newer camera https://

Why is Nikon like this? They can well match the pack and provide the quality that blows them away. Then they choose to do things like only jpg in pre-capture and a 20mp Z6iii instead of 36mp.

The Z5ii is just about everything good about the Zf but with a body that makes sense for a general use photographer. That was always the thing about the Zf, with a BSI sensor and EXPEED7, it was far more capable than it needed to be to sell. So people whined about the ergonomis but it realistically

For product photography, the Z6iii has pixel-shift shooting which can be used for increased resolution in set-piece photography on a tripod. That's it's only real IQ advantage. A 24MP FX sensor from Nikon will deliver similar detail resolution and base ISO IQ regardless of whether it's the original

Hey, since you're a beginner, I would advise you to go with Nikon. What I see people saying is repeating platitudes about Sony's "better af" but that is not useful by any means. Cause "af" is not a single parameter, plus: every system has different strong points for "getting a shot". Why I would adv

I kind of don't think z7iii is ever coming. For landscape use, z7ii is already good enough. Probably the z9ii and z8ii will have 66MP stacked DGO sensors, so speed, resolution, and increased dynamic range. I'd put money on that, but I'm just some random person on the internets. I suspect the z6 will