Z50 II

I shot an event with a borrowed D4 and yes the files were really good. Seems to be the low-res sensor. I photographed two events with a D850 and found its files needlessly large. "But then you can crop", not really as the noise per pixel was quite visible, and seemingly not all lenses resolve a D850

No there are serious people here, you also lose DR in FF. I have a lot of cameras, don’t really have a favorite, maybe the z50ii and the om5. I didn't say there aren't any serious photographers here. I don't know why you're saying you also lose dynamic range with full frame either, isn't that a give

A bit of an unconventional option, but the D7500 is routinely on sale for $700. It is not fully equivalent to the D500 (less rugged build, single card slot, 8 FPS vs. 10 FPS, etc), but with the same sensor as the D500 (and the Z50 II, I think), it's honestly pretty good, and modestly smaller and lig

Overview over all reasonable body+tele lens combos, part 1: Nikon Z50 II + Tamron 150-500: The cheapest setup with a megazoom and an extra tele lens. The Z50 II has no IBIS, so you'll probably get somewhat worse stabilisation at wide focal lengths. The sligtly lower resolution also results in a 10%

Hope this helps! the p1100 has a 4.3-539mm f2.8 to 8 lens and a sensor size of 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) and pixel size of 1.339um that would make the aperture diameter 539mm/f8=67.375mm and the 539mm lens would need to be f1.4388 to resolve the detail for red light on each pixel. (539mm*ATAN(4.55mm s