hAP ac2

I pound sh*t out a rb5009. And it does fine .. now I know a hex or a hap ac2 are not even the same. If I had a hEX device I could probably be ok . A MikroTik device with standalone AP is what is solid for me . I have some MikroTik devices with wireless and had some incompatible issues and throughput

regarding your test with the hAP ac2 you spotted exactly why the older architectures are prized for this specific use case. Even with the wireless driver, the IPQ40xx chipsets in the ac2 have tighter hardware-level frequency locks than the older AR9xxx chips found in the BaseBox. The BaseBox 2 is fr

Me three. (TMI follows, thanks to my neurospicyness.) Couple of years ago I built and maintained a full UniFi setup for a small(ish) office environment but obviously was a bit disappointed with all the hype I had heard, as I noticed the “shortcomings” of UniFi management coming from a very nerdish b

Thanks, this is very annoying but I am thankful that MikroTik at least finally realized they can't keep up with all the wireless innovation and so are using Qualcomm drivers instead. There's at least 10 MIPS devices right now so I don't want to spend $100 times 10 for replacement hAP ax2, although I

PVS6 MikroTik hAP ac2 Thank you the recomendation. I want to avoid using a Pi because I know this will be a better longterm solution (e.g. I can add other IoT devices down the road). I'm willing to put the effort in to get there, even if its a bit more legwork.