LS50 Meta

I understand how wave guides work, but you can see the measurements for yourself. Off axis slopes down in a balanced way, yes, but you’re still getting much more information to your ears by having the tweeters point at your ears. If it sounds good to you the way they are though then all good. https:

The Cinema 70 probably isnt the best amp for KEFs tbh - need more power and higher current Beyond that, the ls50 metas I had were very position sensitive. So it honestly could have just been bad positioning. Alternatively - you don’t like KEF - can’t do much about that. Just don’t buy KEF if it’s no

I've the same colour except my Kefs are the wired LS50 METAs. Cracking set up and look great in white IMO

KEF LS50 Metas for near field listening are phenomenal. You will likely want to add a sub as they roll off early. Would pair very nicely w the H90. The KEF will give you a critical, detailed listening experience. The Ascend recommended above are going to be deeper, with wider dispersion. The KEF are

I've been very impressed with my Oberon 3s. I "downgraded" from KEF LS50 Metas and a KC62 sub to just the Oberons and the reality is that the wide dispersion and generous bass response of the speakers alone are just way more enjoyable for my typical ambient, off-axis listening. On-axis midfield list

I don't know what price point you're looking at for these options, and admittedly they are a bit all over the place when at MSRP so aren't easily comparable. B&W's house sound emphasizes the top end. Some find that fatiguing after an hour or two of listening. DALI is an energetic sound, a little bum

You're right. All KEF speakers need 4-ohm stable amplification, and any that rely solely on a single Uni-Q driver for full-range (Q150/Q1 Meta, Q350/Q3 Meta, LS50/LS50 Meta) for anything other than nearfield listening must be used with a subwoofer and high-passed to protect them from low frequencies

Just wanted to say that the main reason you want to add a sub, is not just for extra rumble, but so that you’re clearing up the mids and highs as the lower frequencies are shifted from the LSX’s to the sub. In saying that - I’ve heard the LSX II’s firsthand and agree with you that in a nearfield set

If this is mostly nearfield / desk listening and you’ve only got 10–20 cm from the rear wall, I’d prioritise controlled bass and good off-axis behaviour over sheer scale. Quick thoughts on your list: KEF LS50 Meta – excellent imaging and midrange, but they’re not ideal that close to a wall without s

I have to let someone else give you a definitive answer on the bass. Reason is the wireless/powered versions of the LS50 include some bass and treble DSP compensation, which you won’t have. I use a slight bit to compensate bass for boundary conditions. So not a fair comparison. However, I can say th