X100VI

TLDR version: I own both. Buy the Q3 43, it costs more but that’s because it’s much, much better. I wanted a decent quality, carry everywhere camera - better image quality and better ergonomics than an iPhone but lighter than a Z8 with lens. I’d previously had an X100T, but had never really got on w

You will 1000% not miss the look of Fuji photos. Ricoh GR3/GR4 photos are consistently lauded as sharper than Fuji photos. There are also a number of recipes for the Ricoh cameras, most notably Reggie's Portra. When you factor in how portable the Ricoh cameras are and how they are much cheaper than

Well, I was in your shoes months ago. Decided to buy iPhone 17 pro in October (upgraded from iPhone 14). It has a great camera for a mobile. Took it to Venice, Paris and Amsterdam, shot lot's of pics also in my home town and nature outings. But still didn't scratch the photograpy itch. So I got Fuji

It depends what you’re used to. My previous cameras have been mainly Nikon - D70, D2x, D3, D3x, D800, then Z7 and Z8. Next to these the Fujifilm X100 series are slow and flimsy with very iffy focussing (although the vi is a big improvement over the T) And obviously the first thing I did was go throu

I guess OP just needs to prioritise: Want film sim SooC? Then Fujifilm. Want (fairly) compact? Then X100VI or X-E5. Want interchangeable lenses? Then X-T5 or X-E5. Want something that doesn’t feel like a toy? Then X100VI or X-T5. 🤷‍♂️

As someone who previously owned the X100VI and recently switched to the X-E5, I can tell you that in reality, both cameras share most of the same core components. Aside from the fixed lens and the hybrid viewfinder on the X100VI, the materials used for the body, the tactile feel of the machined dial