X100VI

TLDR version: I own both. Buy the Q3 43, it costs more but that’s because it’s much, much better. I wanted a decent quality, carry everywhere camera - better image quality and better ergonomics than an iPhone but lighter than a Z8 with lens. I’d previously had an X100T, but had never really got on w

もし日本語で説明した方がいいなら言ってください。 簡単に言うと、これは富士フイルムのカメラをもっと上手く使うための基本的な考え方と、センサーの特性を少しずつ理解していくためのガイドです。できるだけ分かりやすくまとめています。 投稿が英語だったので、このまま英語でも書きます。 ⸻ Look, brother. Before buying every accessory people recommend, slow down and actually learn the camera first. I personally don’t think filters and extra gear ar

I did not spend much time using manual focus lenses before the M11. I slapped a Helios 44-2 and a speed booster on my Fujifilm XH2S (sold) back when that lens was all the rage. I loved the results, but found the focusing process on the XH2S a bit finicky. It could have been the focus peaking, and it

I like the look of it. If it had been available when I bought my X100VI I would have seriously considered it because I did see value in having a zoom lens, I just didn’t prioritise it above everything else. If it keeps Fujifilm on their toes and makes them add better AF to a X-100VII then everyone’s

*Editing to add that it is the same camera OP bought. It was the Canon Powershot Ixus 70 for us Aussies, the Powershot SD 1000 Digital Elph in the USA and the IXY Digital 10 in Japan. Not particularly "special" but very cute. It came out in 2007 and I have owned mine since then. It's tiny and I was

Yeah honestly that’s a really practical way to look at it. That’s kind of where my head is - less about what’s “special” and more about what I’ll actually use without thinking. The ease of AF and just being able to hand it to someone does feel like it would change how often I shoot. Also a good poin

I can't say for sure, but owning the LX100ii (which appears to have nearly the same lens assembly as the L10) the X100VI IBIS is superior as far as total number of stops of advantage, although it sometimes produces some motion blur for mysterious reasons, while the OIS on the lx100ii is always consi

I’m a Fujifilm X100V user, and I also shoot with the Leica M9, M10, M6, M4… so I can recommend something that actually fits what you’re looking for. I’d need to know why you use the Fujifilm X100VI. Is it because you feel that with the film simulations it’s like shooting film? And also how you use t

There were a few reasons why I didn’t get along with the X100VI, and why I returned it to keep the RX1R III, even though I have an X-H2S (soon to be replaced by an as yet unknown Sony). The first was the autofocus performance. My X-H2S is acceptable, if not Sony good, but the X100VI is only ok in AF

Interesting results, and to be expected in the areas where a large sensor’s strengths lie, but surprised to hear some unexpected results with the X100VI regarding the EVF, autofocus noise, and gritty files. Disappointing to hear that the X100VI EVF underwhelms. Was it brightness, contrast, resolutio