X-T30

Fujifilm has more fun factor for sure. I really like the user experience. I traded an x-s20 for an S5II. I have also owned an X-H1 and X-T30 II. I do miss the smaller size and more affordable lenses, but I didn’t really care for the film simulations and if you mainly develop raw files, I will say th

I have an x-t30 ii and see zero reason to go for the iii model. The iii‘s autofocus is marginally better, and that film sim dial is gimmicky. The film sim dial only contains some of the film sims. Instead, on the ii, I have set one of the buttons for film sims that lets me instantly access all of th

I don't think you need to go up to 1500 GBP. Check out the Fuji XT-30 II. It's 800 pounds base price, or this kit comes with a lens for another 100 pounds. I have this camera (though different lenses) and it's phenomenal. I can't imagine you would benefit from the features of some of the more expens

Fuji is certainly compelling in the APSC space, but having evaluated both I went for a Z50 years ago with various lenses and can say this: The kit lenses from Nikon really are mindblowing for the price/weight, the 16-50 and 50-250 are so easy to carry around and very sharp, this is one thing that dr

Thank you :) I used a Fujifilm X-T30 with its standard objective 18-55 mm. And yes, I work with Lightroom. But some shots already looked so good without much editing, so I tried to pull out the natural beauty, lighting, etc.

In the tests I did alongside an X-T30 III, I noticed that this simulation is slightly warmer. However, when I set the white balance shift back to zero, it actually becomes cooler than Reggie’s version. That’s why I decided to leave it at a point where it simply felt right to me. It’s inspired by the

I've very happy with the Fujifilm X-T30 ii. It's a good step between " nice hobby" and " entry professional" camera. The built-in film simulations are fun to play around with, so you do you have to spend so much time in editing. Plus, it can be paired up with some of the instax printers to print ins

Uma câmera que não pode trocar lente tá? Então pense bem. Isso limita em 100% as suas opções de fotos. Se quer uma fujifilm pelas cores e vibe das fotos, pega uma xt30 então, que dá pra trocar de lentes e etc e eh mais barata.

X100VI is fantastic for grab-n-go family/travel 40MP sensor, IBIS, film sims make portraits/pop landscapes pop without editing, lighter than your 500D (521g). But $2k used? Steep for a fixed 23mm lens (35eq), no zoom/versatility for kids/events. Better value alts under $2k: Ricoh GR IIIx (~$900): Po

The Fujifilm X-T30 iii would be the next step on the Fuji path. It's a DSLR with film simulations. Most of the common DSLR controls without being too complicated. Interchangable lenses. And it's relatively lightweight and small. Not pocket-sized small but still hipbag friendly. It's a larger sensor