EOS R6 Mark III RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM Lens Kit

You can get a refurb Z8 for new A7V money if you hunt the sales. Z6iii is much cheaper and still extremely good, if you don't need the pixels, the Z6iii is simply a better choice than the A7iv (in fact I'd argue the Z5ii is generally a better choice than the A7iv, having owned both) Despite the use

I have good news on the first point, my friend: Canon isn't claiming any particular technological leaps with this sensor, but our initial testing shows that it has even faster readout speeds than the lower-resolution chip found in the EOS R6 II. The R6 III has some truly impressive rolling shutter r

I have the em1ii with the 12-40f2.8 and the 40-150f2.8. I enjoy the system overall but recently decided to run a dual setup with canon r6iii paired with the 24-105 and 100-500. Honestly, I’m actually enjoying the canon a lot more. It isn’t as heavy as I’d feared and the IQ is incredible. I originall

Canon is good but R6III has serious overheating problems (even in burst photo mode). For video only Lumix is good (nice ibis, codecs, open gate). If you want video oriented only go Lumix

Go with the Z6III.R6III is the little bit better camera, it has better AF, more MPX, opengate video etc, but as you said, lenses are more expensive, and you cannot buy 3rd party lenses for RF mount.On the other hand, Z6III is great...AF is fast, 24mpx is more than enough, it has raw video, and you c

Re. colour science: The "colour science" differences between various manufacturers is basically a non-issue at this point. It's pretty darn simple for someone with even an intermediate understanding of color correction to match one camera to the next so long as you're recording in log in at least 10

You have pretty great camera for docs really, and w24-70 is great too The main problem with canon is that it’s expensive not underperforming. Now if you wanted 2 more R6ii or r6iii and 3x24-70… it gets pricy. R5m1 is overheating but the rest is rather fine. I doubt 70-200 will be that useful but wit

Like everyone else I've been waiting for this camera. From a photography side it's amazing, but from a video side it's disappointing. Most of the competition is giving higher resolution 12bit video while sony limits it to 4k 10bit. So many people repeat the same no one uses 6k 12bit and even if they

Lol it's not you the A7IV and now A7V is much more detailed that the FX3 and that is definitely a reason to go with the A7V. I think the A7V is the better buy than the FX3 if you don't do/rely on the following: - Raw video of higher bitrate all-i codecs (A7V can still record ProRes to an external re

The Canon R6 II and Nikon Z6 III are good mid tier options. The Z6 III is newer with a faster partially stacked sensor. This reduces EVF blackout in continuous stills shooting & rolling shutter jello in video. The Canon R6 III is supposed to launch later this year depending on how quickly you're loo