EOS R6 Mark III RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM Lens Kit

I have the em1ii with the 12-40f2.8 and the 40-150f2.8. I enjoy the system overall but recently decided to run a dual setup with canon r6iii paired with the 24-105 and 100-500. Honestly, I’m actually enjoying the canon a lot more. It isn’t as heavy as I’d feared and the IQ is incredible. I originall

Do you need it now? The Z5ii is cheaper and satisfies all your requirements, but since it's new it hasn't been discounted yet. If Canon or Sony introduces an R6III or A7V, the previous models will get discounted too. I wouldn't consider the S5IIX since video is not your focus. Realistically the Z6ii

While I agree with you - to some degree I think that era of old entry level canon dslrs should be long forgotten. They were reliable but dreadful to use, noisy and with shitty autofocus. This is precisely the case for an upgrade, no matter of which camera OP will but differences will be significant.

For photography and video I like Canon R6iii. For something all in one the Sony RX10.

Thanks! I've been working for years with a Canon R6 and rf100-500. I'll see if I can afford to upgrade to the R6 mark III or at least mark II next year. The extra pixels and improved auto focus really sound great.

Great. That would speak for the R6V/R6iii imo. Depending on if you want to shoot stills as well you might want to look at the R6iii as well(viewfinder). If you need extreme lowlight capabilities for instance i‘d get the FX3. Also keep in mind that the FX3 has a 1:1 readout in 4k and the Canon is lin

I stay away from canon because of the locked down RF lens ecosystem. Sony gets all of the third party lenses and accessories first because they have the largest market share that allows third party lenses. Also canon typically doesn’t have great dynamic range. The R6iii tests done by CineD were lowe

Nikon ZR, Canon R6III if only shopping for new. if you’re open to used options, get an a7sIII or FX3. the dual native iso at 12800 of the Sony’s is insane, but the ZR and R6III still hold their own at 6400. r6III would also have the advantage of being a non-compromised photo camera, in case you ever

Lol it's not you the A7IV and now A7V is much more detailed that the FX3 and that is definitely a reason to go with the A7V. I think the A7V is the better buy than the FX3 if you don't do/rely on the following: - Raw video of higher bitrate all-i codecs (A7V can still record ProRes to an external re

Can you say more about subsampling at 120p? How does that affect quality? Because the sensor is too slow to read out all the pixels across the frame in time for the next frame (1/120th of a second at 120p), it has to skip every second line. That throws away half the light (and detail), immediately m