EOS R6 Mark III RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM Lens Kit

Do you need it now? The Z5ii is cheaper and satisfies all your requirements, but since it's new it hasn't been discounted yet. If Canon or Sony introduces an R6III or A7V, the previous models will get discounted too. I wouldn't consider the S5IIX since video is not your focus. Realistically the Z6ii

I have the em1ii with the 12-40f2.8 and the 40-150f2.8. I enjoy the system overall but recently decided to run a dual setup with canon r6iii paired with the 24-105 and 100-500. Honestly, I’m actually enjoying the canon a lot more. It isn’t as heavy as I’d feared and the IQ is incredible. I originall

Nikon ZR, Canon R6III if only shopping for new. if you’re open to used options, get an a7sIII or FX3. the dual native iso at 12800 of the Sony’s is insane, but the ZR and R6III still hold their own at 6400. r6III would also have the advantage of being a non-compromised photo camera, in case you ever

Lol it's not you the A7IV and now A7V is much more detailed that the FX3 and that is definitely a reason to go with the A7V. I think the A7V is the better buy than the FX3 if you don't do/rely on the following: - Raw video of higher bitrate all-i codecs (A7V can still record ProRes to an external re

Both are great cameras. For sports, you'd have to consider if 40 FPS is more important than 14-bit + blackout free shooting. It also seems that the buffer on the R6iii is better. In a comment of his YouTube video, Gordon Laing replied saying that the delay on the R6iii's EVF is not significant in or

Yeah honestly it’s all about the lenses and user experience of the body now. I only shoot film Leicas, but I slapped my M lenses on my Canon R6iii for the first time the other day and the images were so much better than what I get out of Canon L glass, it wasn’t even close. 2026 sensors are pretty m

The R6 II is great, but for strictly photos, it is overkill. I still use a 5D III for stills, and the R6 II for video. As long as the 5D III keeps working, I have no need to upgrade for REP. If I had to use one camera for stills and video, it would 100% be the R6 II or III. (I am institutionalized i

I think it confirms the general direction for rather big zoom, so all the options above are valid, they are rough in your budget. Zooms do well in semi macro that is another plus. You have rather great light there, sun and open space so f6-8 will be fine, hiding options rather restricted but you sho

OK fair point; the Z6iii's DR at below ISO800 is mediocre by modern standards, the Z8 too, although that has the saving grace of its ISO63/80 modes. But the real outlier is the very impressive A7V which truly excels below ISO800; the Z5ii/Z7ii are prettty close to or roughly on-par with the (both mu

I wouldn't blame you for switching, that's for sure. Sony's a7v and Canon's R6iii would also be solid options, with Nikon's Z6iii behind, but not much behind.