EOS R6 Mark II

The irony is that I had that exact complaint 12 years ago; I was running dance photography workshops as part of a (contemporary) dance festival I was running, and I’d hired a lot of cameras for participants. High ISO handling was featured with these Canon models, but I found I was having to use insa

In my opinion it's a non-issue, and while it's visible in lab tests, you aren't likely to ever notice it in your real world photos. Stacked sensors (in this case partially stacked) pay a tiny DR penalty in return for faster readout speeds which for most people is going to be far more useful. If you

This is one of the things that I've been in conflict with for a while now... One of the places I know for reviews and tips is YouTube, and every time I looked before getting my current setup there were people praising the Canon EF 100-400 mk II vs the RF 800mm f/11 or RF 100-400 because "muh best le

I'd say what you want is a new mid-range FF, something like a used R8 or similar (I don't know much about Sony or Nikon). Older FF often have much worse low-light capabilities, not to speak of AF and video specs. On the Canon side there's the R6 Mk I or R8, while the R6 Mk II is still ~1600 or so, b

Everything but Canon is great, because of their ban of third-party lenses. Some very good concert lenses like Tamron 35-150 F2-2.8 are missing at all, available on Sony and Nikon only. Theroretically the Canon dual-pixel AF should be better in low-light than competition, but I compared my Sony with