Alpha ZV-E10

Okay, I will cut this short, if you need a viewfinder then zve10 does not have it. Remaining 2 are very same but A6400 has better build quality and should not be much expensive over A6100. Both the A6XXX do not have any IBIS, zve10 has it. My advice, coming from a professional photographer, go for S

I'd skip m50 ii because it's a discontinued system. R50 is the direct replacement. I'd also skip zv-e10 because it doesn't have a viewfinder (LCDs are tricky in bright light). The others are all good. Best to just see them yourself in a camera store and pick the one that feels the nicest.

I’m mainly going to be doing photos, α6400 then. ZV-E10 is a video camera first and foremost; its ergonomics combined with the lack of a viewfinder of any kind make it a horrible body for stills.

I was thinking of getting the same but a6400 is better as a overall package. It also has semi weather sealing, evf and a better build quality than the zve10. You can also get a6600 from online stores at the same price as a6400 but its officially discontinued by Sony. Just dont get the kit lens with

When I was trying to learn how to save preset settings for photo taking as great outdoorsy kodak moments are close to impossible to take for both, I didn’t have the dial on top which can make you jump right away to different modes in ZV E10. Sony’s assumption is I’m a vlogger and my setting is fixed

I am using a Sony ZV-E10, which is more like a vlogging camera than a proper stills camera. It doesn’t have a viewfinder, which limits my capabilities in bright light and good weather. Sometimes I’m literally shooting “blind.” So what speaks in favor of full frame? Better image quality. My portfolio

I’m primarily video, so I bought with that in mind, but I’ve been using a Sony ZV E10 and their mid range 70-300mm lens. The lens is great, but the body is verrrryy much budget, it’s one of the cheapest things they offer that’ll shoot 4K. I also have a 10-20mm wide lens for B roll and some vlogging,

The R100 and R50 basically have no competition, the price point is extremely competitive. The Sony zve10 and Nikon Z30 are video centric with no evf. Not having an evf is a deal breaker for photography in daylight. The Z50 and Sony A6400 are ~twice the price of the R50 and R100, they are competing a

I'd suggest getting a Sony Mirrorless camera over the ZV-E10, because of the lack of EVF. I have the A6400. I was also thinking of the ZV-E10.

Few points to note - Both ZV-E10 and X-M5 are video first cameras, and both lack EVF and IBIS. Instead of ZV-E10, I would prefer getting a Sony A6400. Sony has better auto tracking and more real life colours, whereas Fujifilm has better looking moody colours which I personally prefer. If you can ext