Alpha ZV-E10 II

ZV-E10 for pictures as it has a mechanical shutter. The video isn't bad either when you want to use it. ZV-E10 II when you want to do a bit of post processing (wanting to make the video look "cinematic" for example). Yeah, I'd just recommend the ZV-E10 especially at its price point. Personally only

Assuming you mean the ZVE10 Mk I, s-log is not worth it. That camera can only record in 8bit, either internally or over HDMI. S-log does not work well in 8bit. Skintones turn to blocky red mush in the grade. It squashes all the colours to the middle of the colour range, but there simply isn’t enough

A simple mirrorless should be your choice. Canon R50 with the kit lens is okay. Fuji xm5 Sony ZV-E10 Mark II Yan yung mga magkakasame category that's way cheaper than RX How to choose? Canon R50- clean finish out of the camera. I'd say a balance look SOOC. The colors are best for daylight, blue skie

For talking head stuff, use your phone. You can just get a cheap tripod and get it in place. The only real problem is that you won't be able to see yourself, though there are solutions if you google it. For gaming commentary, it kind of depends. How big is the webcam frame? If it's a tiny rectangle

The R50 and R10 aren't as good as the ZV-E10 II for video. The a6700 is a great, well-rounded, camera. I think you would be better off building a lens selection around it than any other camera here. The ZV-E10 ii can't do flash, the a6x00 cameras can (and the a6400 has one built in). The Canon R50 h

Pretty much on the same spot. Per my research Sony has the widest range of in-brand and other compatible lens options. And sigma 18-50 is quite solid, though do note that it has no OSS, meaning footage will be quite shaky. Consider the Tamron 17-70mm if you can, same aperture with vibration control

The A6700 and ZV-E10 II use the same sensor. (The FX30 uses this sensor as well.) 1. A6700 - A hybrid camera that works very well for both photography and video. 2. ZV-E10 II - Primarily a video-focused camera in most cases, and it is $200-300 cheaper (at least in Europe) The A6700 has better build

Can you give a little more details on what kind of content you want to create? Music videos and concert photos are vastly different, for example. If the former, the ZV-E10 II with a gimbal/tripod would be good, as you'd probably do all audio/video syncing in post and won't need the IBIS of the A6700

So, I'm someone who is making a similar decision. For me its for my Youtube channel. What I ended up deciding is I'm going to get the ZV-E10 II with the kit lens, then use it with that for awhile and save up to pick up some more lenses down the road. For me it comes down to the better sensor, 10 bit

I'd ignore the need for OSS if you have no predisposition against digital stabilization. Imo Gyroflow>Ibis, I have the sigma 17-40, viltrox 56 1.2 and a 70-200 GM II, only the gmaster has OSS and while being nice for photos they all perform the same for video with gyroflow. I do handheld work with a