Alpha FX3

Lmaoooo 🤣🤣🤣 thanks for this comment made me feel better about the situation! The worst part! Is I went out of way to for this wedding I rented out a Sony fx3 because I wanted to get the best image quality possible.

Sony FX3/FX6 or Canon C50/C80/C400. Travelling with bigger cameras, especially those that require a bit of putting together, is a pain in the ass. Not impossible, of course, but having done a bit of travel work (and shot many music videos that could easily have been shot on an FX3 with no compromise

No, but I'm using it as an A camera and FX3 as a B camera now. A7v is better in nearly every way except the fan but I've shot hours long interviews and live shows with the a7v and never had any heat warning. The only other thing is the fx3 has cineEI and shutter angle. CineEI is easily replicated wi

Long time Canon shooter but I’d get Sony for sports. The C80 image is totally different than the C70, and for the worse in my opinion. It’s not a bad look but it’s definitely sharper and less organic feeling. The autofocus is a million times better though, along with other qol improvements. I see a

I know the FX6 has some cine body niceties like internal ND, SDI, etc, but I view the FX3 as basically a full sibling to the FX6 that embraces slightly different compromises. I don’t think of it as a lower tier really… FX3… You lose internal ND, but you gain stabilization. You lose some ports that a

What evidence points to you believing there will be an fx3 mk2? Search the history here and like every other post is something exactly like this. Nobody knows, but it's more likely they update the fx6 before. The fx3 is a great camera, even if a mk2 comes out. If you have "new camera" money and need

No matter the camera, they all have a ‘base’ iso for their LOG profile. For the r7 and the fx3, that base iso is 800. You should be shooting at that and adjusting either aperture or adding ND to control exposure. Sony has a second base iso of 12,800 - you can shoot at that and control exposure the s

Don't feel bad because the FX2 isn't actually worth the price. The FX3 is still a better camera after half a decade. No idea what Sony is even fucking doing

Best camera out there for small ob doc IMO. I always liked Sony. First docs were shot with the Z1 which in retrospect was a terrible camera, but at the time it felt magical to go from SD to HD. Sony has a softness to it, that I can’t get with Canon. I like how it renders skin tone better and definit

Investing in a lens will give you more than buying the FX3. A solid lens on the FX30 will give you amazzzzzingggggggg image. The FX3 is a champ In low light but unless you’re literally shooting a cactus in the desert you typically don’t need to worry about it. There are plenty of other full frame le