Alpha a7R III A

Yes, it just tightens everything a little more in terms of image quality. I keep buying 16MP bodies, be it Olympus or Panasonic and I just end up selling it down the line. The tighter noise pattern, colour shifts, just a little more dynamic range surprisingly adds up. I quite like my OM-1. That said

I did an experiment a few years ago where I took a photo of a colourful scene with an EF 85/1.8 on my Canon 5D-II and then the same photo with the same lens mounted on my Sony a7R-III. I then reduced the resolution of the Sony image down to that of the Canon and posted the images to see if those who

Just left Sony for a S1Rii. I’m strictly a photographer. I started with Sony 10 years ago with a Walmart bought Sony. Then A6300 > A7riii>A7r4>A7CR. To me the pics out the camera on the Sony were too clinical had no Soul. Even using picture profiles. I’m blown away by the LUMIX. Sold all my Sony gea

Recommend Z7 II. https://cameradecision.com/compare/Nikon-Z7-Mark-II-vs-Sony-Alpha-A7R-III

I'm kind of in your boat right now. I have an A7R III, and its just too large and complicated to use for everyday photography. I was looking at the Fujifilm X-M5 (900) with a Fujifilm 23mm f2.8, 35mm equivalent (450 but there's third party alternatives). it ends up being a bit smaller than the X100V