Alpha 7S III

Pixel size having any noticeable effect on low-light performance is a myth. https://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm Add the A7SIII (12mp) and A7RV (61mp) and look at how they have the exact same performance from ISO 1600 to 12800.

Been saying this for years now. There is no upgrade for the FX3. It’s like upgrading a hammer. A hammer does what it’s supposed to do. They offered a better screen with the FX3a. There’s nowhere for the A7SIII/FX3/FX6 to go. That 12MP sensor is very specific and special.

Let me once again get up on my soapbox and preach the gospel of the ZV-E1... Exact same sensor and processor as the A7SIII and the FX3 in a much smaller, lighter and cheaper body. 4K60P with no crop, 4K120p with an APSC crop, amazing low light capabilities, 4:2:2 10bit codecs and really excellent AI

The lenses will definitely shape the look, especially that soft quality. But I'd say the art direction and lighting are the main factors here. Practice those. Look at the contrast ratio between highlights and shadows on their faces. Where did they place the lights? In post, use grading to bring to l

Хрень это, на самом деле а не 108 мегапикселей. Просто маркетинг. На качество изображения в первую очередь влияет размер сенсора, размер пикселя на этом сенсоре, и сколько света он получает. Камера, на 10 мегапикселей, но у которой большой качественный сенсор, улавливающий много света - снимет чётче

Get an A7Siii used. Best deal by a mile. Especially if they toned down the noise reduction (not sure if they did this though). That higher second native ISO of 12,800 on the FX3, A7Siii, and ZVE1 makes a large difference. Between the FX30 and FX2 definitely grab the FX2, you can save money buy getti

Better low light. Better IBIS. Rock steady & proven workhorse. I use my A7SIII more than my FX3 (form factor just works better for what I do), but the magic is that sensor. I also own and use the C80 and R5C, so I’m familiar with Canon.

Yea, the jump from the a7III to the a7SIII and newer Sony FF mirrorless is a big one. Not just 10-bit color but also general color science and image rendering. The a7SIII sensor is what's in the FX6, though I know a lot of pros would rather use interframe codecs for everything, so XAVC S is definite

FX3 is not a good choice, FX2 is an even worse choice, if you like lowlight video: A7SIII because it has an EVF, but I would pick the A7V now because you get the FF and APS-c options, one of the reasons I have the A1, but for video: it overheats pretty quickly. If you got the money A9III because it

I must have missed that, I apologize. You're looking for an upgrade then, my advice was predicated on you not already owning a camera. If you're absolutely in need of low light nothing will compare to a full frame Sony. I'd still encourage you to save money if you can and buy the a7siii, as it is $1