Alpha 7R V Full-frame Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera

OM isn't 'the poorest system' for landscapes. That's a narrow mindset of the uninformed (usually FF shooters who've never used M43 and go by specs). It's extremely difficult to tell the difference between 11 or 12 stops in a print (for example). The difference is more in the operator than the gear.

I have found that comparing iPhone pictures with dedicated camera pictures before editing and at low resolutions, the iPhone pictures often look better. The iPhone does a bunch of corrections to the photos to make them more pleasing, and I usually have to put the dedicated camera photos into Lightro

Inevitability the conversation will come around to (be dominated by) the eternally boring M43 vs FF sensor. This is the wrong path to go down for you, IMO. There are as many advantages to M43 as there are for FF and ditto disadvantages. Firstly I'm going to quote your specific genres that you shoot

which 61MP sensor? the Sony sensor in the A7Rv is insanely slow and would never satisfy anyone buying a high end Nikon.

I have 4 of your 'ideal M43 kit' and the 40-150/2.8 which is very bit as good as the 50-200 (check the head to head testing), the 17mm I don't need (as I love and prefer my favourite lens - the OM 20/1.4 Pro). That just leaves the 150-600 on your list ... and I'd take the 150-400 over that every day

Sony and Lumix's Tilt / flip out is clearly the best of both worlds. It's in the a9iii, a1ii, a7rv, a7v for Sony, and the S1ii, S1Rii, S1iiE for Lumix. But that said, is it really worth switching for? Sony's closest offerings to the R5ii (that have the screen you want) are either slower and higher r

M11 highlight recovery is worth it if you shoot in fast paced, variable light conditions. I can pull back 2-3 stops of overexposure on the m11 while the m10 is blown out around 1+. High ISO images aren’t all created equally, quality of light makes a big difference. I reg shoot at iso 6400 and up and

sony has the fastest autofocus on the planet and has backlit sensors to help with light - a7r v or a7 v would be good for you....I'd trade up to be honest (I just moved from sony to X2D v1 - though I do mostly landscapes and macro for a hash company so my needs are vastly different)

I read that often "the remaining millimeter will by feet" but that's not really true. As soon as you move, you change perspective (i.e. relationship between foreground and background). And often it is not possible to move (inside architecture, outside landscapes). But I am sure you know all that. Fo

OM has very devoted fans, and they tell a lot of things. Be careful. What OM definitely has is very cheap access to stacked sensors. This offers unique opportunities for macro photography. You can shoot with a flash with an electrionic shutter, and that's exactly how macro photographers do it. If yo