a9 II

I moved to a Zf to shoot for personal trips alongside my work A9ii’s. Once I saw how snappy that camera was in comparison (and the price difference) I jumped ship and sold my Sony gear. I’ve been working with the Z9’s for an over a year and absolutely love them.

If fast action is a priority for you, the Sony a7 V or even an used Sony a9 would be a better option. If you don't need all the features of the a7 V, an used a9 would be the best value body. The a7 IV was designed to be an all-rounder while the a9 was designed specifically for sports/action/wildlife

You actually prevented me from upgrading to Sony, thanks! I got the R8 and never noticed rolling shutter issues even though I exclusively shot in electronic shutter mode. I liked the lens choice/price but the Sony bodies are really expensive and got low frame rates unless of course i pay 5x for A9ii

The a9iii seems like it comes from the future and I played with the idea of moving to Sony for a night. I landed on the a9iii as the only entry point (and then selling all the canon gear) because I didn’t think the a9ii was going to be a big improvement. That seems like a lot of change (and high pri

The a9iii seems like it comes from the future and I played with the idea of moving to Sony for a night. I landed on the a9iii as the only entry point (and then selling all the canon gear) because I didn’t think the a9ii was going to be a big improvement. That seems like a lot of change (and high pri

"if this was true then both A9II and A1II would do 60 autofocus calculations per second only" your posts are wrong, for instance: "...[a1ii]with full AF/AE tracking is possible at 50.1 MP15 resolution, with up to 120 AF/AE calculations per second" https://www.sony.com/en-ae/electronics/interchangeab