a7R II

Je te comprends. Je suis passé de MFT (Olympus) à FF (Sony), puis retour à MFT (Panasonic) pour la compacité, et là je suis en APSC (Fuji) qui est je trouve un bon compromis qualité/encombrement (mais j'ai énormément hésité à revenir vers Sony). Le passage d'Olympus à Sony a apporté énormément pour

Using the magnify button to punch in for focus helps, One of the benefits of mirrorless is you can get cheap adapters and very cheap quality lenses. I use my E-PL1 with old Prakita/Pentacon lenses, Have not spent more than £30 on a lens, 28mm 2.8, 50mm 1.8 and 135mm 2.8. Its a cost effective way to

Agree, my current set up consists in a Sony a7rii (which I picked up on eBay for really cheap) and a vintage Vivitar 55mm f2.8 macro with the Valoi Easy35 v1 and the results are mind blowing!

I switched from Canon to Sony about 4 years ago and am perfectly happy with Sony, although I regularly contemplate buying a vertical grip just to get more comfortable ergonomics. If I'm being brutally honest, I'm not longer thrilled (my level of happiness decreased from about a 9.5 to a 7) with my 1

if you want better quality and like FF lenses specially vintage ones its worth it. if you want the newest models they are expensive but if you dont need great autofocus or fast shooting, there are many great full frame mirrorless camera choices you can get used for under 1000$. sony a7iii/a7rii, can

keep the a7iv for photography and more run and gun stuff. IMO 12,800 iso on sonys is overrated and used moreso as a crutch for event videographers. It is helpful for dark wedding receptions and concerts where you can’t always setup lights. But if you’re transitioning to more commercial stuff you’ll

If you value resolution and quality, then you might be best off with a DSLM + fisheye lens. I do this more or less as a hobby myself and in the past have had a Sony A6300 + 7Artisans fisheye lens (I think that was it), as well as a tripod and nodal point adapter. I think the costs were around €300-4

Used Sony a7r2 if it needs to be under $1000. a7r3 if you're willing to go up to $1200. Still need a lens but I that's your choice. Great camera, versatile, and will be a solid competitor for another 10 years. And you can remove connect and dump photos wirelessly to your phone for immediately publis

The person's entire budget is 1500$... He'd be better off with a Nikon Zfc or a Canon R than a Sony 6700... He could even get an A7RII or an A7III for half that price, and get good lenses with what's left.

I use a Sony A7RII with a Pentax-A 645 120mm Macro with a Fotodiox Pro adapter. VERY sharp lens that isn't too expensive. It's a big lens though, and probably best suited for a copy stand. I DIY'd mine for pretty cheap inspired by some who shared their own here and elsewhere on the 'net.