A7III

if you shoot raw there are no color differences, because raw files don't have any color, it's mostly up to the raw processor and the camera profile that it uses https://blog.kasson.com/the-last-word/roles-of-camera-and-raw-developer-in-determining-color/ zve10 is basically an a6100, so it should hav

I found a Sony a7III for $500 on marketplace. But genuinely I’d just use your phone.

The beauty of Romania. I think it’s slightly underexposed, but the sky was very white and I’m not sure if I balanced the colors correctly. Sony A7 III, Tamron 28–75, 1/125, f/4.5, ISO 100.

Depends on your budget. I’m a Sony person personally. The R6III is a better camera for sports than the A7III, but about 1.2k more expensive.

That's valid, but to me it's like buying a two seater sports car to move bricks. It works, but you could have gotten a truck for the same amount of money. Personally, I feel like I'm giving up a lot of features in order to have a very small camera. The trade off is worth it to me. If I was gonna hau

I have the same setup but not used the Kodachrome 64 yet. These are stunning! Thank you for de-influencing me from buying new kit! (I've been looking at switching to a Sony A7iii recently, but this reminds me I love Fuji colours and simplicity)

i've shot action sports at up to 1/10000 on the a1, at 30fps, there is no problem with the eshutter, i don't know what you mean by that. There is a tiny HUGE difference between an A1 and an A7iii. Sensors with slow readout have a higher likelihood of problems with fast shutter speeds when used with

Very nice pic. I think the grain suits it nicely but I'm also at a stage when I keep thinking how my pics would look after DXOing. BTW I have the same kit and I'm a little bothered that the lens is a little too shiny. It fits perfectly on A7C, but on A7III it's too elegant. Makes the camera look lik